Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Team Stat Rankings through Week 1


Pantha-kun
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

It's one game, so I am not going to draw many conclusions and certainly not many beyond decisions and performances in one game. 

It's just one game, but it's kinda not.

We saw the run defense be garbage through most of last year. That it starts off looking the same is...discouraging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Waldo said:

They had 8 sacks and we had 0. Ugh, Riddick may just indeed be missed.

Looking for droped passes. I remember 2 for the Browns but wanted to see how that played into the passing game and pass D. Couldn't find it tho.

 

Honestly, I started feeling thus way last year, but I feel like Week 1 of this season confirmed it...  YGM seems like a bust.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Honestly, I started feeling thus way last year, but I feel like Week 1 of this season confirmed it...  YGM seems like a bust.

the whole D line besides Burns seems like a bust. And Burns isn't as good as people say he is. Its been years and hes the king of "Almost got it." Ive seen him whiff on so many sacks and that stupid play of him hugging Brisetts leg while Brisset just throws the ball away got me fuming. Burns is a decent DE but he's no super star. And everyone else on the dline is a god damn bum. 

Burns would be a perfect #2 DE if we had a bonifide #1 Peppers type on the other side. 

Edited by Pantha-kun
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's just one game, but it's kinda not.

We saw the run defense be garbage through most of last year. That it starts off looking the same is...discouraging.

Yep, like I said, I am not looking for a huge move toward the middle in that rating, unfortunately.  We entered this game with it as a concern, the results confirmed that concern (or made it a fear), and the results Sunday would have been worse had the Browns committed to the run for the stretch where they seemed to confuse Brissett with Rodgers.  Our opponent Sunday could abuse us again in that area.

If we are walking away with any conclusions from week 1, it is that this specific area of concern in genuine.  Nor do I think Snow has any answers, and there may not be any good ones on the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Pantha-kun said:

They were officially credited with 4 sacks. Myles Garret lead the team with 2 sacks with 4 other Cleveland defenders recording a 0.5 sack

Lol my bad. It was their preseason stats. Tuesday and lots of stuff still not updated. Good catch, I was like where the hell did some of those come from. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, you're right. It doesn't mean you can't call out his flaws and poor play. But it also doesn't mean you can't admit when he plays well and shows improvement. Not you personally, just in general I mean.
    • I will say, I do think there's a version of Bryce that could be really successful as a high-volume passer in a spread-based offense built around quick throws and timing-based intermediate throws with deeper throws schemed up around them. I actually think the power run based offense we're running is a poor fit for Bryce as it requires him to play under center far more often. It's a very traditional offensive approach whereas I think a scheme that spreads defenses out and lets Bryce distribute the ball quickly with anticipation and accuracy is the sweet spot for him. The key, of course, is to find a way to run the ball efficiently out of those formations. Our personnel right now (backs and OL) aren't good fits for that style of offense and I'm not sure it's a scheme Dave Canales favors very much either.
    • I root for him, and I hope for the best, as does essentially everyone. But that doesn’t mean you can’t call out flaws and bad plays. And that’s what a lot of people get wrong.  I hope I’m wrong and that he continues to improve a lot, I just doubt it. But I’ve been wrong before 
×
×
  • Create New...