Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Other games


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

They actually look worse than us.  At least we kept the lead against AZ until the third qtr.  And Dalton looks worse than Mayfield.  

Honestly, I disagree strongly. If we turned the ball over 3 times there's zero chance we'd score 17 points in three quarters. The Saints are getting their asses kicked because of three INTs including two pick sixes.  They look terrible, yes. But nowhere near as inept as we do.

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Honestly, I disagree strongly. If we turned the ball over 3 times there's zero chance we'd score 17 points in three quarters. The Saints are getting their asses kicked because of three INTs including two pick sixes.  They look terrible, yes. But nowhere near as inept as we do.

 

 

Ints are inept…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Ints are inept…

Despite that they've scored 24 points and are still in this game. If we'd turned the ball over three times including two pick sixes we'd be getting blown out in hilarious fashion.

I said earlier that we'd never score 17 points if we turned the ball over three times but hell, if I'm being honest I'm not sure we could score 17 if we were the team that got the two pick sixes off those three turnovers. We absolutely suck out loud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Despite that they've scored 24 points and are still in this game. If we'd turned the ball over three times including two pick sixes we'd be getting blown out in hilarious fashion.

I said earlier that we'd never score 17 points if we turned the ball over three times but hell, if I'm being honest I'm not sure we could score 17 if we were the team that got the two pick sixes off those three turnovers. We absolutely suck out loud.

42-24 is just as bad as 24-10

the saints are a bad team that lost to us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:

He's my fantasy "TE" this week so yes to that idea

Same lol I’m gonna keep exploiting that TE designation as long as I can. Hill now has at least one passing, rushing, and receiving TD on the year. I wonder if he’s the first player to do that since CMC a few years back after his infamous TD pass to Chris “Martinez” Manhertz against the Saints.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah and I am doubtful he can offer that consistently. I don’t have many years left at my age and in my view we have wasted two and this whole exercise with him was always a three year minimum.  I am out on that with a guy I don’t believe in, and never believed in, it has sucked. To me it is a costly detour off the right track. Years.    But I am not so rigid that I can’t see excellence. He needs to display it though, consistently before I change my outlook.  
    • No, when I said rage, I meant rage, which only applies to certain fans on this board. Your timeline of trying to assess whether he is the future or not is really tied to the discussions surrounding his second contract. If this team is going to commit to some monster contract while he has shown nothing but glimpses of brilliance would be deservedly worrisome, so the clock is genuinely ticking for him to settle into something resembling his final form. Perhaps a best case scenario is that he plays well, the team succeeds, but he does so with a more limited role that makes the rest of the league view him as a game manager, and his second contract value reflects that. Then he continues to improve and becomes a bargain comparatively while not handicapping the team around him, and we enter an era of consistent championship competitiveness that the fanbase has craved for decades and has never really experienced before. But that requires many, many things to go right and for Bryce himself to facilitate that if he ends up being the quarterback of the future.
    • Exactly. And the flame throwers as well, get location benefits from not going all out. But they have it in reserve.  Not sure how much Greg had but he was an artist.  There was a YouTube I came across last year or maybe even 2023 and I don’t how to even find now but it had two NFL QBs I want say one was Carr from the Raiders but I don’t really remember  The point of it is they stood side by side throwing identical distances to identical targets. Radar gun was used.  They threw the normal effort (not all out) and it was measured etc. Then they were asked to throw their ‘fastball’. They were missing and most often they were missing high. It demonstrated the same principle.    edit: and applying that to arm strength, give me the guy that doesn’t need max effort to have good velocity. The margins are so narrow with less velocity in tne NFL the defenders can Close on it and this is a league where they value down to the 100th of a second level. It is that tight 
×
×
  • Create New...