Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Team Building in the 2020s (courtesy Howie Roseman)


davos
 Share

Recommended Posts

Quote

“[Y]ou have to make a decision on what your priorities are on building the team, whether you’re going to kind of go with the flow or you’re going to kind of figure out what is the most important thing for your team and if there’s some value in being different and figuring out what now is kind of the next area,” Roseman told reporters. “I think we spent a lot of time, Coach [Nick Sirianni] and I talk about this all the time, if we’re going to be the same as everyone else, we’re probably going to finish in the middle of the pack. Sometimes you have to take risks and you have to stand out there and do something different than everyone else. So that doesn’t mean that there aren’t right decisions to make at that position. But at the same time, if you’re doing the same thing that everyone else is doing, you’re probably a step late.”

I'm not looking to the Iggles as some pure & perfect model by any means.  But I respect the way in which that franchise operates and has been able to rebuild multiple times after Super Bowl runs in rather quick fashion from Reid to Pederson to Siriani. 

The things I'd like to note:

  • Howie & Nick's dynamic is a strong and well defined one.  They know each other's roles & compliment one another.  
  • You have to take a risk.  Which, I'll admit we've tried in some ways, but not necessarily with sure-fire talent.  We've rather taken gambles on questionable or mis-developed talents  
  • And being a trend setter and not following the flock.  Identifying NFL trends and responding to them in a calculated fashion

So, having the dynamic between GM & HC established, being forward thinking and taking calculated risks are basically the crux here.  These type of things are becoming way more important again because there has frankly been a few dud QB drafts and now the league is starting to thin out in that department. 

As the Manning brothers, Ben, Rivers, Ryan, Cam, Brady, Rogers, etc. have all wrapped/wrapping their careers, busts or average joes are boiling up like Fields, Wilson, D Jones, M Jones, Tannehill, Carr, Baker, Sam, Lance, etc.  The QB market is looking more and more sparse and these instant-play rookies aren't there anymore.   

Mahomes, *Trevor, Burrow, Herbert, *Hurts, Allen & Lamar are basically the legit QBs produced in the league in the last 5 years.  If we're lucky, there's 1-2 franchise QBs coming out of a draft, maybe 3 in a good year.  0 in some as well. 

Now in knowing this, in a league that's moved away from the RB workhorse approach, successful teams seem to be finding their superstar (or two) at wideout and building a strong OL. WR wise...

Cooper Kupp

Jamar Chase (+Higgins)  

Jaylen Waddle (+Hill)

AJ Brown (+Devonte Smith)

Jefferson

Evans (+Godwin)

I can go on here, you get the picture.  All part of the better clubs.

And in response, teams have had a big focus on their secondary instead of their DL.  And on the DL, there's a targeted approach at a stud multi-tech guy who can play inside and out, along with dynamic LBs either on the big side of S tweeners.  It's kind of what we've attempted to do on defense which I give credit to, it has been a bit forward thinking, but we just don't have the right linemen pieces.  LAC, PHI, Bills, & Niners are at the forefront right meow.  

--

Okay then--this year so far, there has been a tremendous downtick in the QB-WR air play for many teams because of this response and also rule adjustments.  Refs are simply letting more holds happen/staying a bit loose with the yellow flags.    

Really curious to how teams respond league wide.  And throwing the question out--How would you rebuild a team right now? 

I'm really teasing this out because I really want to become one of those teams who seems to be a trend setter.  We just seem way too reactive to things going on in the league and getting the litter from other teams.  No real risks or coherent strategies, mainly on offense.  And we're fluttering into oblivion.  Really hoping we can find that with this next regime. 

You guys got any good ideas on where that next GM/HC combo might be?  I saw the Ben Johnson thread by scot and it just got me thinking...

cheers.

source article: https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2022/04/21/howie-roseman-shares-an-intriguing-philosophy-about-following-trends-in-team-building/

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a big Roseman fan. It's such a mixed bag with him. Always a fan of take what works and ignore the rest if you can.

I think we are stuck with Fritterer, who will hire a hasbeen HC who will be on the hotseat by the 2nd half of year 2. Lets talk after that because I do not think Tepper is ready on any level for that conversation.

Edited by Waldo
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if you want to get that innovative guy, you have to get people to interview him that understand what that looks like. Tepper doesn't. He can't ask in depth football questions and have any idea what is BS and what isn't. That is quite literally how we ended up with Matt Rhule.

So he has to get some trusted and more importantly KNOWLEDGEABLE football people around him to find that next head coach. He can't be the guy making that choice because he quite simply just doesn't know enough to discern that. 

Until he has the right kind of support system around him in the organization, we don't have a lot of hope. Tepper isn't going to be able to bridge that knowledge gap my himself.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rest of the league figured out 15 years ago that you don't try to build your roster around the highest paid running back(s) and pray that he (they) would stay healthy, but we still haven't figured that out yet. Maybe someday we will also figure out that having good coaches and not trying to do reclamation projects on every QB who was thrown away by his old team isn't a good formula either.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

I think if you want to get that innovative guy, you have to get people to interview him that understand what that looks like. Tepper doesn't. He can't ask in depth football questions and have any idea what is BS and what isn't. That is quite literally how we ended up with Matt Rhule.

 

He might be able to now if he actually lets Scott Fitterer and Dan Morgan handle it.

They might disagree with his ideas though (can't have that) 🙄

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

He might be able to now if he actually lets Scott Fitterer and Dan Morgan handle it.

They might disagree with his ideas though (can't have that) 🙄

I don't really know that I consider Fitterer that kind of guy either. He might be or he might not be. 

Regardless, someone there has to understand football at the level necessary to see the same vision as the prospective coach and understand how likely their methods are to be successful.

The funny thing in hindsight is how we almost all got excited about some of the ridiculous BS that Rhule was selling. Not many of us as laymen saw through what now seems to obvious was just obvious snake oil.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't really know that I consider Fitterer that kind of guy either. He might be or he might not be. 

Regardless, someone there has to understand football at the level necessary to see the same vision as the prospective coach and understand how likely their methods are to be successful.

Well if your benchmark for football knowledge is Marty Hurney, that's not exactly a high bar to clear.

I mention them though primarily because they're who he has available right now.

Granted, he could look elsewhere but I don't think he will.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is something that has irritated me for a while. I'm going to address his play during these "game winning drives," 8 of them apparently, clear up some nomenclature, and address some points specifically. The games in question.  Also responding to this  What is a Game Winning Drive? This is an undefined term and therefore can be whatever the person using it wants it to be. The term itself removes context from a result which lends itself to be used by people arguing in bad faith. Some people like to attribute every time Bryce is on the field in a situation like this to him "winning the game," or just kind of associating him with a "Game Winning Drive" and leaving it open ended. There's no criteria for what a GWD is. If you had a spectrum of what this could encompass it, on one end you'd have a single player being responsible, and on the other you'd have all 11. Put another way, a QB going 9/9 for 99 yards and rushing the final yard himself is on one end of the spectrum, and on the other is the blocking tight end who was just kinda there. Hey, he was on the field too.  For these purposes, I'm going to hedge and say a GWD is something you know when you see it. I'm not going to claim Bryce hasn't had one, but I'm absolutely not going to give him credit for every one of them. Reasonable people can disagree at the margins, but generally I think we'll be in accord more than not. I also want to look at the context of these, because I think we need to keep in mind how the team got to that position. There's a certain "mystique" about the term game winning drive. Like all of a sudden, when the game is on the line, the QB just turns it on and becomes a better player and blah blah blah. Nothing else matters because he Just Wins Games It neatly ignores the circumstances that led to a team needing a last second drive against some of the worst teams in the league, and this should be taken into consideration. This was an argument made in favor of Delhomme for years...until a certain game that we won't mention.  In reality, defenses are tired by the end of the game, defensive coordinators will generally give up yards in exchange for clock, and offensive playcallers will be more aggressive. That's really it.  But Fiz, why now? Why tonight? People are building this narrative about Bryce Young because it allows them to overlook the rest of his performance, his role in getting the team into whatever hole they're trying to crawl out of, and minimizing the contributions of everyone else (or assigning blame to players other than him) to make him look like he's better than he is/being let down. People in the national media with motivations I can only speculate on are doing this and it's irritating. Also it's very slow at work tonight and it's either this or reruns of ER.  I'll be looking at the final drives here (more or less) when the Panthers were in a position to win or tie. I'll also be adding some context as a I go. So lets just look at these.  2023 Houston at Carolina - 5/10 41 yds, FG  The Panthers drove to the Houston 44, then ran it 6 times in a row for the final 12 yards before the Texans started diving offsides. Panthers weren't just killing clock; Bryce had already taken one sack on the drive (six on the day!), and I don't think any of us feel like Pineiro had a 60 yarder in him in 2023. He did have 5 FG in him though, which is all the scoring the Panthers could muster. It was enough.  Game Winning Drive: eh, Bryce didn't really cover himself in glory here. If you think getting the team into range for a 60 yard attempt before letting the RB finish the job is a GWD, then we're going to have some problems. I'm generally kinda dubious of the whole "wow he set up a long range field goal for the win what a legend." Why yes early career Tom Brady was a fraud carried by Adam Vinatieri why do you ask  Atlanta at Carolina - 5/6 53 yds, GW FG Game Winning Drive: yeah, I think so. It was a miserable 9-6 win against the Desmond Ridder led Atlanta Falcons. Prior to this final drive, Bryce was a whopping 13/18 for 114 yds and the offense had managed 6 whole points. Hard for me to say here they weren't in the position to need a GWD because of how ineffective Bryce was. That said, I think it's fair he did this one on his own. Credit where credit's due little guy, you did it.  2024 New Orleans at Carolina - 1/4, 38 yds Game Winning Drive: not really. Panthers win 23-22. Sanders scored from 16 yards out on the ground, Carolina was only there because of a DPI (a theme with Bryce), Bryce took a sack on the 2 point conversion, and then the defense stopped the Saints afterwards. Prior to this Bryce had a very Bryce esque 15/22 133 1 Td 1 Int performance going so he was just kinda there.  Again, this is where context comes into play. Completing 1/4 passes does not "leading a game winning drive" make. If that's the dividing line, everyone on the field led a GWD, so the term becomes meaningless.  Carolina at Giants - 0/0  Game Winning Drive: no matter what a GWD is, it's certainly not this, and if anyone argues differently you can disregard them. Daniel Jones fumbled on the first play of overtime, Panthers ran a couple times and kicked the game winning FG. Prior to this, Bryce was terrible. Panthers were up 17-7 with 5:31 in the 3rd quarter, on the back of Chuba. From that point on, Bryce went 2/6 for 14 yards. Panthers had two 3 and outs and got just 2 first downs. Panthers overcame him here.  Arizona at Carolina - 0/0 Game Winning Drive: no. On the panthers second possession in overtime, Chuba ran it twice for 49 yards and a TD. On their first possession, Bryce completed a 1 yard checkdown, took a sack, and the Panthers punted after totaling -4 yards. Furthermore, Bryce couldn't convert a 3rd and 3 at the 2 minute warning up 3 points. Arizona got the ball back and tied the game.  Carolina at Atlanta - 5/5, 71 yards  Game Winning Drive: sure whatever have a day. For context, it's generally accepted in Atlanta sports media the defense was trying get the coordinator fired that day, which he was. I was at the game. I'm not saying the players had a conspiracy, but I'm not sure how it would look different if they did. but hey, as long as weird poo keeps happening against the Falcons, let it ride.  Miami at Carolina - 3/5, 45 yards, TD  Game Winning Drive: yes BUT. I don't want to re-litigate this. Briefly, the Dolphins have a historically bad defense, the Panthers were only trailing because of how badly Bryce played, the defense bailed the team out, and Rico was clearly the MVP. Trying to sneak this into a narrative about Bryce and his game winning drives is an attempt to hide how completely dogshit he was for most of the game. On second half drives to start, Bryce went.... 0/1 passing, took a sack, FG 2/3 passing, 18 yards, Delay of Game on Bryce, punt 2/2 passing, 16 yards, took a sack, punt  1/3 passing, 4 yards, punt  1/1 passing, 4 yds, 2 defensive penalties, 43 yd run by Rico, 1 yd TD run Absolutely dismal performance Dallas at Carolina - 3/6, 25 yards, FG  Game Winning Drive: Panthers had 34 yards rushing on this drive, and Rico rushed for more yards on the day than Bryce threw. People will want to point to the 7 yard slant to Renfrow, but that's one moment. Why do you need a 4th down conversion to kick a game winning FG against the worst defense in the league? The Renfrow catch is just as meaningful as the DPI (again) on 3rd and 7. Hard for me to say yeah Bryce gets credit for this and Rico doesn't. or Ryan Fitzgerald. People aren't going to be telling stories about where they were when Bryce got 25 yards passing to set up a 30 yard FG to beat the worst defense in the league.  Conclusion I'd say low end 3, high end 6 for what I'd actually credit Bryce for with having a game winning drive. Absolutely not for the Giants and Cardinals game. Saints game probably not.  As far as questioning which games need a GWD because of Bryce, I'd argue Miami, New York, 2023 Atlanta, and Houston definitely. League average QB play and you don't need the heroics. Bryce had multiple chances to seal the game against the Cardinals in 2024 and couldn't do it. The defense picked off the Cardinals late in the 4th quarter at their 11 yard line after the Panthers went 3 and out, including a classic Bryce check down short of the line to gain on 3rd.  About half of the time, it looks like these GWD, whomever is responsible for them, are happening in part because of what Bryce did or didn't do. I don't think league average QB play is too much to ask for. Panthers usually win these games despite of Bryce; he's an obstacle to be overcome.  Stats Taken in totality, in these situations Bryce's stats are  7 games 17/26 passing for 233, 1 TD  65% completion rating  13 ypc 8.9 ypa I'm not going to compare this to league average, I'm just going to point out you'd expect someone with 8 GWD to have more than 1 TD.  Other side of this  but what about the games in a similar situation where they DIDN'T win? Shouldn't we look at those games too? Maybe find ones where Bryce absolutely lost the game with a pick, or calling an audible into the wrong play, or spiking the ball with zero seconds on the clock after throwing into the middle of the field, or all of the turnover on downs? Maybe also go into some of the games that have been mythologized, like the Eagles game that ended on a turnover on downs where Bryce had 3rd and 4 in Eagles territory and couldn't get a first down? Yeah...someone should do that...
    • Best RB tandem in Panther history (at least for a few weeks)
×
×
  • Create New...