Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB Controversy Part2


Icdeadpeople
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Icdeadpeople said:

Let's see 2 TDs for PJ and 1 for Will...oh let's not forget the defense they each faced...PJ faced 9 out of 11 starters, Will faced 3 out of 11, your point???

Look at completion %. And I was wrong PJ had zero rushing TDs. Will also played the starters in one of the games. You have no argument.

B4D175E9-CCC8-4728-97F8-9FC16B2D793D.png

18EB4EE9-A729-47F3-A4F5-C41E3DE6EAFB.png

F5089730-81EA-4FE1-929E-AEDEDAEB5F8A.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no QB controversy because we have no QBs to have a controversy about.  When Darnold comes back, we will have three guys who may not be in the league next year.  It would be a pretty safe bet two of the three will certainly be out of the league, and PJ is one of those.

PJ's NFL career is completely dependent on Rhule, and Rhule's NFL career is spiraling into the ground.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

There is no QB controversy because we have no QBs to have a controversy about.  When Darnold comes back, we will have three guys who may not be in the league next year.  It would be a pretty safe bet two of the three will certainly be out of the league, and PJ is one of those.

PJ's NFL career is completely dependent on Rhule, and Rhule's NFL career is spiraling into the ground.

The controversy is PJ...we're guarantee to make the playoffs with him starting, how many huddlers are going hate the next couple wins piling up taking away their high hopes for a first round bust, no matter what happens PJ starting for the Carolina Panthers is going bring controversy to this board. If he gets us to the playoffs do you realize there will be fans mind you who will be disappointed...c'mon now time to get on that train or get left by the tracks 

cmon-n-ride-it-quad-city-djs.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Davidson Deac II said:

We don't have a qb controversy.  All our qb's are equally bad.  

Aren't you a little bit excited to see him crash in burn and finally lose to shut us "never lost" campaign up...and hey if that doesn't work out for you guess what you get to enjoy your team's success...win/win if u ask me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This draft is 2023 all over again, it's not hard to see. QB's who don't grade out as high first round prospects while at the same time, the following draft class looks to be loaded with elite QB prospects. Drafting a QB just because you need one (or making a bad trade to make said draft pick), when there isn't one worthy of that draft pick, is how you ruin franchises, just look at us right now.  
    • I upgraded to the S24+ a few weeks back. Very happy with it. 
    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.   And yes, I've never said I'm not a T-Mac homer. But me being that doesn't change that he will be the highest graded offensive player in this year's draft, at a position we haven't been able to solve since we lost Smitty.  Taking him makes all the sense in the world, my bias aside.
×
×
  • Create New...