Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No 1 overall pick, the path forward and what you need to know.


panthersgreenville
 Share

Recommended Posts

So it’s as clear as day that this season is lost as far as playoffs are concerned but turn that frown upside down because now a new type of playoffs has emerged, and that is the path to the number 1 overall pick.

So who has made these “playoffs” so far.. Well it’s us, Commanders, Lions, Steelers and Texans. In my opinion, if I was a betting man, one of these teams are going to win the “no 1 pick super bowl.” 
 

So who is our biggest threat? Well for starters, the Steelers don’t scare me at all simply because even if they get the no 1 pick and say we get no 2, it’s no biggie because they won’t take another QB in the first round after drafting Pickett anyway despite his struggles. We are most definitely taking one though. I mean sure, they “could” but the Steelers just don’t strike me as a team like the Jets or Browns to take two QBs no 1 overall. So scratch the Steelers as being an enemy. 
 

If I had to choose the next team I’m not so worried about, it’s the Texans but for a different reason. Two big things going for us when it comes to the Texans A. SOS tie breakers and B. They have a tie in their w/l record which means even if they lose out and so do we A. We already beat them with SOS but even if that changes, that tie would mean we would have more actual losses and thus we would leap frog them anyway. 
 

Which brings us to our last two teams, the Lions and Commanders. These are two teams that would definitely take a QB so if they somehow get picks 1 and 2 and we get 3, while it would suck, it still wouldn’t necessarily be a disaster because luckily for us, we picked a good year to have a bad year considering there are 3 legit QBs in this draft between Stroud, Young and Levis. In fact draft experts can’t even decide who should go no 1 between the three of them because they are all three great prospects.

Also, a big wild card in all this is while it would have been great if the Lions and Commanders played each other (they don’t) we do actually play the Lions toward the end of the year, so we do control our own destiny in that regard by simply losing to them. 
 

In summary, yes, this is the NFL and sooo many variables and so much can happen, but 5 games in this is where we stand and as long as we can just stay in that top 3, we will still be in good position to nab a potential franchise QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, bigdog10 said:

Man, how deflating it is to be on the huddle on October 10th and reading threads like these. 
 

We haven’t even made it one calendar month since the start of the 2022 season, and we’re already focused on draft position. 
 

Thanks Tep!

To be fair, I start to think about the draft this early every year.  I am just digging a little deeper than usual this sesaon.

So, we DO NOT want the #1 overall pick or #2 for that matter.  I am not sold on Young or Stroud.  We want to be behind the Commando-skins.  They will DEFINITELY take one of those guys.  The Lions, Falcons and Texans could be in the market.

Edited by 45catfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, panthersgreenville said:

we picked a good year to have a bad year considering there are 3 legit QBs in this draft between Stroud, Young and Levis. In fact draft experts can’t even decide who should go no 1 between the three of them because they are all three great prospects.

I keep telling myself this but at the same time worry that maybe there’s no clear cut consensus because none will be legit franchise QBs. It’s a constant battle in my head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a big fan of building through the draft, but not at all a fan of playing for the #1 overall pick.  The percentages are not with you.  Since 2000,  Payton and Eli Manning are the only QBs drafted 1st overall that actually won a superbowl with the team that originally drafted him (Payton drafted in 1998, Stafford was traded to LA).  Other notable #1 overalls that made the superbowl but lost in that time period include Joe Burrow, Jared Goff, and Cam Newton).  Of the 28 superbowl QB's since 2000, only 6 were drafted 1st overall.  On the other hand, there are 4 superbowl winning QB's in that time frame that are questionable NFL starters at best - Foles, Flacco, Johnson, and Dilfer.  

Usually what happens is that teams that draft a QB #1 overall aren't very good teams.  They rush the rookie into service and things go poorly from there.  It looks more like a list of walking woundeds than franchise saviors.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tbe said:

Bryce is smaller than Corral and Levis is Mel Kiper’s favorite.

It doesn’t appear this is a great QB year past Stroud.

Not as top heavy, but I'm okay with that.  I want to wait until later in the round or round 2 to nab our QB.  This class is deep, it doesn't have a whole lot of hype outside of Young and Stroud.  I'm cool with that because production wins games, not hype.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, ENC Pantherfan said:

I don't see the Lions taking a QB. Goff has been very good this year and the Lions offense is rolling (well at least up until yesterday). They need more defense. 

you don’t pass on an elite QB prospect because you have jared Goff 

If Goff was playing at that high a level, they wouldn’t be competing for the top pick 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ncsdawg said:

I'm a big fan of building through the draft, but not at all a fan of playing for the #1 overall pick.  The percentages are not with you.  Since 2000,  Payton and Eli Manning are the only QBs drafted 1st overall that actually won a superbowl with the team that originally drafted him (Payton drafted in 1998, Stafford was traded to LA).  Other notable #1 overalls that made the superbowl but lost in that time period include Joe Burrow, Jared Goff, and Cam Newton).  Of the 28 superbowl QB's since 2000, only 6 were drafted 1st overall.  On the other hand, there are 4 superbowl winning QB's in that time frame that are questionable NFL starters at best - Foles, Flacco, Johnson, and Dilfer.  

Usually what happens is that teams that draft a QB #1 overall aren't very good teams.  They rush the rookie into service and things go poorly from there.  It looks more like a list of walking woundeds than franchise saviors.  

now do the numbers for QBs drafted 38 overall

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Not as top heavy, but I'm okay with that.  I want to wait until later in the round or round 2 to nab our QB.  This class is deep, it doesn't have a whole lot of hype outside of Young and Stroud.  I'm cool with that because production wins games, not hype.

Have you ever seen that stats around the success rate of QBs take outside the 1st round?

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, trueblade said:

Draft classes are more than just the first pick. Unfortunately, Fitts again traded away future picks.

Here's a look at the Panthers' 2023 picks.

— Their own first-rounder

— Their own second-rounder

— Their own fourth-rounder

— Their own fifth-rounder

Not that it really matters, but I think we have a 7th too.  IIRC, we traded it away, but got it back in another trade...Daley, I think.  The 3rd rounder loss stings, those guys generally contribute even in their rookie season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

Not that it really matters, but I think we have a 7th too.  IIRC, we traded it away, but got it back in another trade...Daley, I think.  The 3rd rounder loss stings, those guys generally contribute even in their rookie season.

You're probably right. My list of picks was sourced from an article in July. 

Edited by trueblade
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...