Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Was Rhule worse than Seifert?


Who was worse  

69 members have voted

  1. 1. .

    • George Seifert
      11
    • Matt Rhule
      58


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Whiel recency bias tends to definitely have an effect on our perspective, see below.

This.  And Seifert had a background and history working with one of the best coaches in league history before coming here, as well as professional players as a professional coach.  Even the 1-15 season, we were so effing close.  It was just so many heartbreaking losses coming down to the last drive or last play from what I remember.  We were competitive.  

Under Rhule, we got worse each season...  we regressed and not just by a little bit.  The fact we knew if the opponent scored 17, we were going to lose is about as hopeless as it gets.  He was horrible.  

 

we got worst each season with Seifert too. We regressed massively once he took over. Just like that 1-15 season, Rhule had lost many games within a single score here as well. They basically have the exact same story. Except Seifert was a cocky son of a bitch and he wanted people to know. 

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

we got worst each season with Seifert too. We regressed massively once he took over. Just like that 1-15 season, Rhule had lost many games within a single score here as well. They basically have the exact same story. Except Seifert was a cocky son of a bitch and he wanted people to know. 

I would have to go back and rewatch a lot of the games, but just from memory, I remember feeling like we were competitive but just always seemed to find a way to lose.  Under Rhule, it felt worse than that...  By about halfway through last season, I went into every game KNOWING we would not only lose, but would be embarrassed, look unprepared, and completely outclassed.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Whiel recency bias tends to definitely have an effect on our perspective, see below.

This.  And Seifert had a background and history working with one of the best coaches in league history before coming here, as well as professional players as a professional coach.  Even the 1-15 season, we were so effing close.  It was just so many heartbreaking losses coming down to the last drive or last play from what I remember.  We were competitive.  

Under Rhule, we got worse each season...  we regressed and not just by a little bit.  The fact we knew if the opponent scored 17, we were going to lose is about as hopeless as it gets.  He was horrible.  

 

Dude don't even try to argue with him. He's a Rhule simp and can't grasp the reality of facts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Dude, why are you after my opinion like that? I shared why Seifert was the worst coach in Panthers history from my point of view. I had emotional attachment to the entirety of his tenure.

Just bc you and I have different perspectives about shitty coaches doesnt mean anyone is "simping." Whatever that means.

 

 

See there's the difference. You have opinions while I have stats to back up my arguments. You can't just white wash things you don't like. By far 2010 and this year were way worse statistically than 2001. By far John Fox and Seifert records were better too as a whole. It's not because it's new. It's because it was that bad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

I would have to go back and rewatch a lot of the games, but just from memory, I remember feeling like we were competitive but just always seemed to find a way to lose.  Under Rhule, it felt worse than that...  By about halfway through last season, I went into every game KNOWING we would not only lose, but would be embarrassed, look unprepared, and completely outclassed.  

we know a lot more now than we did then. Thanks to the internet. I really thought week to week under Seifert we were going to win. Even weeks after we lost by multiple scores in a blowout.  If we had the internet and what it is today.... we would have hated Seifert even more. 

 

We were one of the worst teams all aorund statistically under seifert his final year. We were the worst rushing defense in the league, 3rd to worst passing defense in the league, 5th worst passing team in the league and 3rd worse rushing team in the league. 

 

2001 we were really bad all around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

we know a lot more now than we did then. Thanks to the internet. I really thought week to week under Seifert we were going to win. Even weeks after we lost by multiple scores in a blowout.  If we had the internet and what it is today.... we would have hated Seifert even more. 

 

We were one of the worst teams all aorund statistically under seifert his final year. We were the worst rushing defense in the league, 3rd to worst passing defense in the league, 5th worst passing team in the league and 3rd worse rushing team in the league. 

 

2001 we were really bad all around.

What do you think we are this year Jesus? You seriously have major blinders on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Snake said:

See there's the difference. You have opinions while I have stats to back up my arguments. You can't just white wash things you don't like. By far 2010 and this year were way worse statistically than 2001. By far John Fox and Seifert records were better too as a whole. It's not because it's new. It's because it was that bad. 

oh this will be fun.... please show me stats that showed that we were better in 2001.... I will even provide you a link to the NFL stats for that year provided by NFL.com. I have put the rankings below.

 

2001
Pass defense: 28th out of 31
Rush defense: 31st out of 31
Pass offense: 27th out of 31

Rush offense: 29th out of 31

 

2010
Pass defense: 21st out of 31
Rush defense: 23rd out of 31

Pass offense: 31st out of 31

Rush offense: 13th out of 31

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

oh this will be fun.... please show me stats that showed that we were better in 2001.... I will even provide you a link to the NFL stats for that year provided by NFL.com. I have put the rankings below.

 

2001
Pass defense: 28th out of 31
Rush defense: 31st out of 31
Pass offense: 27th out of 31

Rush offense: 29th out of 31

 

2010
Pass defense: 21st out of 31
Rush defense: 23rd out of 31

Pass offense: 31st out of 31

Rush offense: 13th out of 31

My dude the season hasn't ended yet. I will be sure to tag you when it's over. We are as of right now statistically on a path to be one of the worst offenses ever. We didn't even break 300 yards total offense until yesterday in garbage time with PJ Walker. Our dysfunction isn't going to get better either with the loss of our head coach and DC. Players will give up and we will get worse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Snake said:

My dude the season hasn't ended yet. I will be sure to tag you when it's over. We are as of right now statistically on a path to be one of the worst offenses ever. We didn't even break 300 yards total offense until yesterday in garbage time with PJ Walker. Our dysfunction isn't going to get better either with the loss of our head coach and DC. Players will give up and we will get worse. 

Why did you come at me stating you had stats to prove that 2010 and 2022 were worse than 2001? When now your comment is basicaly is just conjecture? I dont understand the premise of doing that.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...