Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College BBall 2022


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

Davis will probably get another year at least unless the Heels totally collapse and have a bad losing season. So, I suppose the diehards will have to hope he improves as a coach.

I don’t see any coaching adjustments at all during game play.  None.  This was last year too.  They hit fire from 3 in the tournament last year but Hubert can’t make adjustments.  If it works great, otherwise the team is fugged 

Try a zone…slow the game, speed the game…do anything but the same no offensive sets over and over.  Sad

Edited by Shocker
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, jayboogieman said:

After 3 straight losses, they might not be once the new rankings come out.

I am definitely, positively, absolutely, not a UNC fan, and maybe they shouldn't be ranked at this point. But losing by 12 at Indiana is not necessarily a terrible loss.  In fact, they honestly did a little better than I thought they would.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I am definitely, positively, absolutely, not a UNC fan, and maybe they shouldn't be ranked at this point. But losing by 12 at Indiana is not necessarily a terrible loss.  In fact, they honestly did a little better than I thought they would.

I get what you're saying, but UNC has been struggling with teams they should have beaten easily. Then they lost to Iowa St and Bama. Those aren't exactly powerhouse basketball schools, like UNC and Indiana have traditionally been, even though they're doing well so far this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PFF feeds the beast.  So it’s largely popular for that IMO and is embraced by the NFL machine because it helps feed the beast.  Thats why you see the cute stats pop on the Monday Night football screen lol.  Hot takes? Fantasy football? Yeah, it’s good for the NFL machine for lots of reason.  I do think the league embraces them.  Not because they are actually good at doing what they claim. actual analytics folks are critical of PFF.  Because it’s not analytics.  It’s subjective goobly goo ratings by dudes that aren’t really qualified nor even have the info to do real grading.  you got legit NFL players who say they have literally put PFF grades by the coaches grades and they are worlds apart.  Players have laughed at them pretending they can grade certain plays without the underlining info.  NFL coaches have called out there bologna at pressers.   could it be a quick tool to find out some info that has nothing to with their subjective grades? Sure.  There is a lot of data on 32 teams for cheap. But I do not buy the narrative 32 NFL teams think their grades are worth a poo or remotely accurate or meaningful. 
    • Bills D looks like ass
    • I think that win vs Dallas gave them a big boost of confidence.  Thats a team that blew us out the past 2 seasons. Even when Bryce was playing okay late last season they still beat us pretty bad.  Lets see if we slaughter the Jets or go back to playing sloppy uninspired football and go from there. 
×
×
  • Create New...