Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brugler: Next year's quarterbacks "not universally loved"

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Im begining to agree... ive watched so much college football this year, and I just dont see the ascendance of elite prospects that I thought we would. Of course, things can change... but im not sure we see 2 QBs go in the top 10 this year. 

I think you will.  There's just too much desperation for qb help that teams will take 2 easily.  We are going to be one of those teams.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Waldo said:

So your telling me having another first next year would be a great option now...interesting.

kicking the can down the road isnt the answer.... just bc these kids out of college dont look elite doesnt mean they wont be great. The consensus is becoming that there is not a "sure-fire" pick. However, there are only two* QBs on winning teams right now that was a "sure-fire" pick. 

1. Burrow

2. Tua
 

Edited by TheCasillas
editted bc i forgot about Tua
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

How did we go from “This is a deep, amazing class” to “This class may have 1 or 2 starter level QBs”?

 

It happens every year. Predicting what qb's will emerge as top candidates a year early is a fools errand.  You have to let it play out in the year they come out and the last game is played. Then you will see who rises to the top.

Edited by Jon Snow
  • Pie 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
Just now, Jon Snow said:

I think you will.  There's just too much desperation for qb help that teams will take 2 easily.  We are going to be one of those teams.

I think people are still shellshocked from last year. When thr bar drops that low it begins to muddle the view because it is all up and so far at that.

Pretty much how we will be talking during the coach search after Frule.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I think you will.  There's just too much desperation for qb help that teams will take 2 easily.  We are going to be one of those teams.

@LinvilleGorgehas me on this Anthony Richardson trade back plan... Pending who our new HC is... AND how Richardson finishes the season, I could be down with developing AR while backing up MC9.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Growl Grand Master

Growl

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

How did we go from “This is a deep, amazing class” to “This class may have 1 or 2 starter level QBs”?

 

it’s what you say when it starts to look like you’re not going to get the singular QB prospect you had your entire franchise waiting on

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

kicking the can down the road isnt the answer.... just bc these kids out of college dont look elite doesnt mean they wont be great. The consensus is becoming that there is not a "sure-fire" pick. However, there are only two* QBs on winning teams right now that was a "sure-fire" pick. 

1. Burrow

2. Tua
 

Ohh I am fine with snagging a QB. There is zero excuse to not in this draft. It may not be a 1st but that debate can't really rage until we know where we are picking and who is available.

I was saying it would be nice to have that safety net to take another swing if the first one wasn't good enough. Another 1st in 2024 gives us a lot of options in a worst case scenario.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • frankw
      Mike Tomlin stepping down as HC of the Steelers

      By frankw · Posted

      We've never seen them outside of the structure of two very well ran organizations I'll give you that. And yes they are long in the tooth. I do think they are more than capable of getting a franchise turned around in short term capacity though. They are by no means a long term solution.
    • Joe Bear
      Your Feelings on Bryce Through 3 Seasons? (POLL)

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      You're not making a good-faith argument by blaming literally everything on the quarterback when the defense gave him a fat 38 seconds to overcome its ineptitude, but it seems you're dead-set on blaming him for any problem the team encounters. In this case, it's not warranted. Sometimes it is. But he had no time to throw (pressured on 46% of all dropbacks, an insane amount) and that's simply not all his fault -- particularly when they rush 4 or less and are in the backfield in 1.5s or less. Should we have gotten more than 0 yards? Sure! But he hit a WR in the hands on fourth down and it was dropped. Not his fault. He missed one throw on second down but I attribute first down to a bad play call and third down to poor pass protection. I would've called some quick slants, personally, but it really seems you're saying: - playcalling: Bryce's fault - poor pass protection: Bryce's fault - defensive choking away a lead: Bryce's fault, not the defense - Horn dropping a pass: Bryce's fault It's a great way to garner support on here, because when it comes to Bryce, logic takes such a backseat to context that it's not even in the same vehicle. Plenty of games can be attributed to him. Can't take anyone seriously who solely blames him for that one. 
    • DeAngelo Beason
      Your Feelings on Bryce Through 3 Seasons? (POLL)

      By DeAngelo Beason · Posted

      I don't see how you can logically make that argument when the team beat two of the top teams in the entire league during the regular season.  Now imagine the additional games we would have won against absolute tip top competitors like SF and SEA had we had a professional QB.  You can throw any random stat at the problem you want, but the proof is in the pudding.  We all watched it live.  This roster would have produced 13 wins (wins against SF and SEA, two wins against NO, and would have swept the Bucs) and (almost certainly) a #1 seed with a remotely competent QB.  Those were not games where we needed an all star performance to win.  Those were games where a very, very modest stat line would have netted us an easy win. Nearly every measurable aspect of the team would have been significantly improved with a competent QB.
×
×
  • Create New...