Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Games Week 11


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, jayboogieman said:

Yep. UNC can't play defense to save their lives and Wake's defense isn't that good either. This one is going to have a basketball game score.

Wake's defense is better this year than it has been in years past.  Still not great, but better.  But in the last two games, the offense has turned the ball over 11 times, and several of those turnovers were in Wake territory.    They had 8 turnovers in the second half against Louisville. Two of them were pick sixes.  Three others gave the ball to Louisville inside the Wake 30-yard line.   If they can avoid the turnovers, I think they win.  If not, it's going to be a long day.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Wake's defense is better this year than it has been in years past.  Still not great, but better.  But in the last two games, the offense has turned the ball over 11 times, and several of those turnovers were in Wake territory.    They had 8 turnovers in the second half against Louisville. Two of them were pick sixes.  Three others gave the ball to Louisville inside the Wake 30-yard line.   If they can avoid the turnovers, I think they win.  If not, it's going to be a long day.  

Hopefully it'll be a fun, competitive game. That's all I care about.

Edited by jayboogieman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I won't lie, bought into those who hyped up Levis and at this point, he look as bad, maybe worse, than Van Dyke.  Not to mention he's old so he doesn't have the liberty to learn, he needs to hit the ground running.

Shows no intangibles...or really tangibles minus the zip.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I need to actually do a full analysis but I think the issue was more that we'd rarely have top-to-bottom awesome drafts but we'd frequently have drafts where only 2-3 players panned out, but the 1st is a Pro Bowler and the other two solid starters or backups. We rarely had drafts where only 1 player was good, and we never had absolute useless drafts. At the very least we always had one really, really good guy. The worst was probably 2005 where we got Thomas Davis (Hall of Honor-quality player) and Geoff Hangartener. Evan Mathis was good, but only after he left.
    • Hurney wasn’t good with contracts but I think he was probably above average at drafting.  Not saying he was great.  Just that most draft classes are worthless.
    • Ehh, teams earlier this season double and tripled teamed him with decent success. The reason he beasted out so much with Miami was for some reason they did not much at all. Bad call on their part. But that is his purpose. If he is eating up people that is huge, and theoretically should give others the ability to make a play. But his surrounding cast to do that isn’t great. Brown is something OCs have to put a lot of time to plan for.
×
×
  • Create New...