Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Other NFL Games Thread


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, RJK said:

He’s obviously a project. Just like Richardson will be. 2 years at least 

And that’s ok. People need to adjust their expectations. Josh Allen had 3 games with under 100 passing yards his rookie year. Imagine if they labeled him a bust and weren’t patient….

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

I don't really doubt that they want to pay him. I'm just not sure they can be convinced on the "fully guaranteed" part.

(and I honestly don't blame them for that)

Something has got to give with that with the league in general because I have a feeling that will become more of an issue within the next 2 years across the board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Something has got to give with that with the league in general because I have a feeling that will become more of an issue within the next 2 years across the board.

Watson's not exactly making a case for it in Cleveland.

Other owners hated the Browns for that. They're probably getting a good laugh out of it now.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Watson's not exactly making a case for it in Cleveland.

Other owners hated the Browns for that. They're probably getting a good laugh out of it now.

Did you see the NFL twitter account highlight of Watson's pass to Amari Cooper? It didn't include Watson IN THE VIDEO or mention his name...talk about blackballed in the league. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, matt rhules gut fat said:


Who knows whose reporter or source was accurate. Teppers decisions certainly align more with the loser take though 

1327162E-DBB2-4B5E-B5A2-F4FC33CA312A.png

Go back and read the actual PFT article. Whatever you posted paraphrased horribly. The PFT article only named the minority owners and made no mention of which ones wanted him fired.

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2018/01/16/source-some-steelers-limited-partners-want-a-coaching-change/

Edited by Panthercougar68
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Did you see the NFL twitter account highlight of Watson's pass to Amari Cooper? It didn't include Watson IN THE VIDEO or mention his name...talk about blackballed in the league. 

Can't say he doesn't deserve it...

And it's a good time to remember just how big a bullet we dodged in that story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...