Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

another option than trading for the first pick...


Panfan35
 Share

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, bythenbrs said:

In what universe does Richardson go ahead of Stroud?  Maybe if you squint sideways you might choose Richardson ahead of Levis, but ahead of Stroud?

This time last year….no universe existed with Zach Wilson going ahead of Fields 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Panfan35 said:

teams that could draft a Qb texans,colts,seahawks, falcons and raiders and  now the saints have enough draft captial to move up to screw us out of Qb hopfully after the combine alot players move up 

What you don't want is CJ, Young, Levis, and Richardson all gone before we pick. The hope is that Richardson is there at 9th, and I am fine with taking him there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s not necessarily what I want them to do, but they are going to draft a QB this year whether they take whoever at 9 or trade up.

They can free up enough cap to add a few moderate FAs and sign draft picks. Next year will be about developing a young QB and 2024 when we have over 100 million in cap space, it will be time to roll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Corral looked awful in preseason.

Not sure why people still hyping him. He will be lucky to still be in the NFL 5 years from now. Kid just doesn't have a strong arm to last in this league imo.

He played with 4th-5th stringers. I'm willing to see what he can do with actual talent before writing him off. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Corral looked awful in preseason.

Not sure why people still hyping him. He will be lucky to still be in the NFL 5 years from now. Kid just doesn't have a strong arm to last in this league imo.

Corral wasn’t really getting reps in camp though either.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The ONLY thing Chark was better at during his peak than T-Mac is right now, is that he was an actual burner. T-Mac has better hands, more fluid and agile, better catch radius, better route runner. It's not about stats but short of literally having the video at my disposal (and know how) to cut clips together to compare them, it's just the quickest/easiest way to do it because they's so absurdly polar opposites in output. And again, this has absolutely nothing to do with T-Mac, it's 100% about just being realistic with who Chark was as a player.  I genuinely don't understand why people seem to think Chark was some all world player at any point in his career, he was never anything more than a league average player who had one decent statistical season as the only decent WR option on the team that year. I'd have said the exact same thing last year about MHJ, Nabers, Odunze, and BTJ vs Chark too.
    • Just stop, man. All the college stats don't matter. Plenty of guys who put up big numbers in college flop in the NFL and you and I both know that there are 1st round and top 10 busts every year. While we definitely hope T-Mac isn't one and we hope he proves to be a great NFL WR, you can't assume poo about a rookie who hasn't played a down of NFL football yet.
    • therein lies the problem.  Carry on 
×
×
  • Create New...