Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carr’s destination betting odds


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, rayzor said:

I'll just say I wouldn't hate it if we picked Carr up. I'm a fan and it would help us focus the draft on getting an upgrade at WR, TE, and/or CB.

He'd be more expensive than a rookie, but we'd come out of the gates a lot quicker, we'd have a really good QB with a huge chip in his shoulder, and we wouldn't have to give up any draft capital to get him.

Basically I'm good if we draft one of the top 3 or if we pick Carr up.

I just don’t see this team making the Super Bowl with Carr. He had some really bad games in 2022 and while some of that may be on the team him throwing 3 INTS against the Steelers when the Raiders needed to win that game has me worried we will pick up a QB that can possibly get us to the playoffs but not the Super Bowl. 
Carr is gonna want a long term deal and I don’t feel good about giving a 3 or 4 year deal to a QB that isn’t that impressive and will need a really good team around him to be successful. 
Carr is more Cousins than Stafford, imo. 

Edited by TLGPanthersFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

"We should draft Marcel Dareus instead of Cam Newton."

If the Panthers were holding the first pick in this year's draft, I'm almost certain they'd be picking a QB.

Unfortunately, they're sitting at 9 and moving up to #1 would likely cost more draft capital than a team with so many needs can afford to give up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NanuqoftheNorth said:

If the Panthers were holding the first pick in this year's draft, I'm almost certain they'd be picking a QB.

Unfortunately, they're sitting at 9 and moving up to #1 would likely cost more draft capital than a team with so many needs can afford to give up.

What needs? #2 DE? #2 CB? #3 WR? TE?

Which of those needs are holding us back more than not having a QB is?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jay Roosevelt said:

Carr is MUCH better than Darnold and Mayfield. He's also better than Teddy Bridgewater.

We should still pass on signing him and DRAFT A fuging FRANCHISE QB!

I agree. But maybe they do both at least.  My left testicle says this is probably going to happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Hopefully Tepper shows patience and realizes this team has tried this reclamation QB stuff 3 years and in a row and has yet to work out. 

Carr is at an entirely different level than any of the QBs that have played for the Panthers during the last 5 years.  He isn't top five, but given a decent defense he is in the top 10-12 range.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

This is going to happen isn't it? It makes too much sense not to.

 

I think one of big things on the table is the current NFC south QB group. Whoever lands Carr has the best QB in the division, by far.....no matter the feelings of haters.

Ive thought for over 2 months, 4 QBs will be drafted in the first 8 picks.....Carr doesnt cost draft picks..... Plus Irsay just f'd up and gave away the farm about colts QB plan. 

Carrs deal could be in the "cheap rebuilding my self vein" or it could be a tepper flexer........(TM)

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Carr is at an entirely different level than any of the QBs that have played for the Panthers during the last 5 years.  He isn't top five, but given a decent defense he is in the top 10-12 range.

Carr is Cousins level. Meaning he shrinks during big games and often commits terrible mistakes at the worst of times or just disappears from the game entirely. If that is what the team wants then so be it. At least we’ll make the playoffs but always get beat in the playoffs. Vikings of the NFC South. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's funny how the teams with the great QBs stay at or near the top of the league every season.  Yes it is a team game, but the QB has the biggest impact in most NFL football games. 
    • Look, no one is ever a perfect player.  Since the QB handles the ball on 100% of plays offensively (unless there's a direct snap to a RB or something), I can absolutely see where they get an outsized blame and gain from what happens at any given snap of a football game.   Theoretically, there shouldn't even be a stat or idea to a 4th quarter comeback or game winning drive because you should already have done that during the game.  Losers!  Right?  Just because you win late doesn't take away the fact you tried to lose the game for your team! I'm not a fan of that opinion, but again, I'm just a moron with a keyboard.   Bryce has limited tools.  Bryce has not inspired the same level of confidence in us as Cam Newton did in year 3.  I certainly get that.  We traded a TON of assets to get Bryce, and we still suck.  (I mean, since we've lost games, we're losers right?) I completely understand that some fans are just unhappy with a limited QB and a team that isn't performing well, unless the other teams are worse losers than we are. I will say this:  Bryce will fight until the end.  Sure, he's has some real loser football.   But in close games, he's doing his best to comeback (even against a winner of prevent D). Now is it better or worse if your QB plays their best ball in the first half and sucks 2nd half so long as they finish with 300 yards, 3 TDs for your fantasy points? Who said stats are for winners anyway?  The Panthers and Bryce has a long way to go.  I'm enjoying the winning right now.  Though I do start each game thinking "how will we fug this up today?" Because it's been such a poo show in the Tepper era.  Will he prove to be a legit starting NFL QB?  Maybe not here as evidence by our record with QBs who were high draft picks.  
    • Ive never liked the term game winning drives because they include games where the QB was part of or was the reason the team was behind in the first place. Ive been arguing against this stat since the Delhomme years. It should only count when the QB is out of the equation of reasons why the team fell behind in the first place and is at least half the reason why he led the last drive to give them a lead. It shouldnt count if they just hand it off most of the time and the RB is on fire and they go down and score a TD or FG.
×
×
  • Create New...