Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Duce Staley's T Drill


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

If you watched the Staley presser today, you probably heard him talk just a bit about the Combine drill that bears his name...though he calls it the "T Drill".

Staley even challenged Sheena Quick to try running it. She says she will sometime next week...after training 😀

This tweet includes a clip of it being run...

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember former Bengals DL coach Tim Krumrie once went over to a young prospect and engaged him in some hand fighting to test him. That drill became part of the Combine for a while too after it impressed a lot of coaches and personnel guys.

Unfortunately for us, that little event also helped convince a then Panthers executive that we should draft the player Krumrie had tested.

The player in question was Jason Peter 😖

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In middle school the offensive line had a loose ball/fumble drill that we called the T-drill.

1v1, 3 point stance, Coach spikes the ball, contact then recover.

Win you get to take a knee, lose, back of the line.

Last man left had to turn his helmet backwards stand on one leg and chant “It’s me, it’s me, I’m the Big T!”

 

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

In middle school the offensive line had a loose ball/fumble drill that we called the T-drill.

1v1, 3 point stance, Coach spikes the ball, contact then recover.

Win you get to take a knee, lose, back of the line.

Last man left had to turn his helmet backwards stand on one leg and chant “It’s me, it’s me, I’m the Big T!”

Ouch 😄

Back when I played, they were still doing things like Oklahoma drills. We also ran something called a "Swedish Trot" that I think was originally conceived as a torture method.

I remember our head coach getting hyped up about a piece of equipment he thought called "The Blaster". It blasted us all right 😆

Ah, the good old days...

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Ouch 😄

Back when I played, they were still doing things like Oklahoma drills. We also ran something called a "Swedish Trot" that I think was originally conceived as a torture method.

I remember our head coach getting hyped up about a piece of equipment he thought called "The Blaster". It blasted us all right 😆

Ah, the good old days...

The torture device our coaches used was “Old Smokey”.  A damn near vertical dirt embankment that went from the field back up to the school on top of the hill.  Couldn’t run it, too steep, had to use “all-4”.  Gassers til somebody puked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I remember former Bengals DL coach Tim Krumrie once went over to a young prospect and engaged him in some hand fighting to test him. That drill became part of the Combine for a while too after it impressed a lot of coaches and personnel guys.

Unfortunately for us, that little event also helped convince a then Panthers executive that we should draft the player Krumrie had tested.

The player in question was Jason Peter 😖

That’s some deep Panther lore. I’m impressed, Sir

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

That’s some deep Panther lore. I’m impressed, Sir

Read about it a little after Peter was drafted but before he was revealed to be a total bust.

Not exactly one of my favorite memories 😆

1 hour ago, L-TownCat said:

The torture device our coaches used was “Old Smokey”.  A damn near vertical dirt embankment that went from the field back up to the school on top of the hill.  Couldn’t run it, too steep, had to use “all-4”.  Gassers til somebody puked.

Yikes😦

Junior high Coach used to have us running sideways on a moderate incline but your story sounds much worse.

And yes, I've puked at practice 😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back in high school, we had to do a drill called "bull in the ring". Literally no skill to it. It was just a drill to give high school kids CTE. One person would stand in the middle while the rest of the team circles around him. Coach would call on somebody from the circle to run full speed and bang helmets with the person in the middle. Loved it when I was a kid, feeling the effects from it today lol Really dumb drill

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Castavar said:

Back in high school, we had to do a drill called "bull in the ring". Literally no skill to it. It was just a drill to give high school kids CTE. One person would stand in the middle while the rest of the team circles around him. Coach would call on somebody from the circle to run full speed and bang helmets with the person in the middle. Loved it when I was a kid, feeling the effects from it today lol Really dumb drill

The older I get, the more football just seems like a bad idea. It’s a great spectator sport though 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, L-TownCat said:

In middle school the offensive line had a loose ball/fumble drill that we called the T-drill.

1v1, 3 point stance, Coach spikes the ball, contact then recover.

Win you get to take a knee, lose, back of the line.

Last man left had to turn his helmet backwards stand on one leg and chant “It’s me, it’s me, I’m the Big T!”

 

We had a similar drill in high school, but involved all players.  Win or lose, though, you got back in line. I tried to be ferocious in fumble drills and usually came up with the ball.  Unfortunately, I broke a teammates arm in the 1-on-1 drill one day. 

But the drill did help as I recovered several fumbles during games.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Canales has his msjor issue not doing the obvious regarding running Dowdle but with an average QB we would be in the playoffs with an average QB. 
    • 1. fug TikTak, I ain't clicking that stupid poo. 2. This is really very situationally dependent. Coaching is a huge part but sometimes you step into a scenario where a lot of building needs to happen that is largely out of your control  Recent examples(Last season's hiring cycle): 1. Ben Johnson Johnson chose the OVERWHELMINGLY best open coaching job due to a combination of solid ownership, a solid front office and the most talented roster of the open jobs from that cycle. Negatives were, insanely stacked division. Results have so far indicated that this coaching change has been a massive boost. 2. Mike Vrabel Vrabel went a different direction. He went to a franchise that has solid ownership, a mediocre front office and one of the worst roster in the NFL. However, he has a track record of NFL head coaching success AND lucked into one of the easiest schedules in NFL history(I believe 3rd easiest). Even with that caveat, a clear indicator that coaching has been a huge boost. 3. Pete Carroll Carroll chose one of the NFL's most voliate franchises. Notoriously bad ownership, very bad front office and a terrible roster. But, Carroll is a HOF caliber NFL HC with success at every stop. At the moment, coaching has not been able to overcome the apparent obstacles. In fact, it's been a complete diaster to the extent that Carroll has already fired multiple coaches. One could certainly argue that pethaps Pete has lost his touch but regardless, this coaching change didn't result in a turnaround and Carroll's future there seems in doubt. 4. Aaron Glenn Glenn's first HC opportunity was a doozy. Near worst ownership, a mediocre front office(at best) and a talented core group of players on an underwhelming roster. This experiment has been quite the ride to date. Glenn's personnel decisions have seemingly led to multiple close game losses(2-5 in games decided by one score or less) and the FO decided to have a roster firesale prior to the trade deadline for a wealth of draft capital. The question will be if Glenn will be given the time to actually see this future draft capital realized, now that a significant chunk of the talented core is not longer there. Coaching has not made a difference but is the franchise now setting him up to fail further? 5. Liam Coen Coen picked a mixed bag. Terrible ownership, a remade front office he essentially had a hand in selecting(or at the miminum influenced) and a middling roster. The early results show promise even if the roster shows significant flaws(and Coen shows visible frustration with his "franchise" QB every Sunday). Could be close to turning a 4 win team into a playoff berth. Coaching has mattered. 6. Brian Schottenheimer This was resoundingly viewed as a bad hire but it's also under challenging circumstances. Bad ownership in the sense that the ownership is also the front office, a future Tepper dream I assume. Very talented but very flawed roster. The initial results have been...interesting. A Cowboys team that was a bad 7-10 after a previous streak of three 12 win seasons is now....mediocre? Couple that with wild roster changes prior to the start of the season and up to the trade deadline and it makes for an incomplete picture. It's not much progress but it doesn’t appear to be regressing either. TBD. 6. Kellen Moore Moore chose the most challenging of all openings. The Saints are in the midst of a simulateous roster teardown and attempted rebuild. Decent ownership, a mixed bag in the front office(great at evaluating draft talent, less so in free agency and in salary cap management). The Saints have been awful but, they were expected to be awful. To that note, they were net sellers before the trade deadline. It was reported that Moore secured an agreement that this is long term building effort prior to taking the position so his status seems safe even while the team flounders week to week. Difficult to grade this now as the entire scenario seems to be a long term strategy. TBD.
    • I think he has started to build a culture here.  I think if we had a qb with no limitations we would be seeing a lot more with the offense.  I think most of the coaches that come in and instantly win went to teams that were underachieving previously based on roster talent level.  Based on our roster talent,  we werent underachieving,  we were just bad.
×
×
  • Create New...