Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Tight End question


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I see we're still trying to push a dumb agenda in the middle of good times 😆

Holding our general manager to his words is a "dumb agenda"? Yeah I'm happy about our coaching staff too. I'll be thrilled if and when we draft our QB in the first and develop him. But I can also acknowledge mistakes and not just blame it all on Matt Rhule. You can't handle that because you are smitten with Scott like you've got a personal bromance going with the guy. That isn't consistent with the standard you employed for Marty Hurney and anyone who has read enough of your 130 thousand posts knows this. But you do you and enjoy your weekend 🫶

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, frankw said:

I see we're still entertaining the notion Fitterer had nothing to do with signing Ian Thomas to that absurd contract extension.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CanKB0qpxga/?utm_medium=twitter

Prove It The Kid Mero GIF by Desus & Mero

This was a SMH/WTF issue when it happened.  If I am giving Fitt the benefit of the doubt I would think he was on the WTF side of it but Rhule held the keys to the kingdom so he kept giving Rhule the rope to hang himself. 
 

We will probably never no but I suspect why Fitt is still around is because he kept documentation on all of this crap so it landed on Rhule. The next season or two should give us some idea as it has been stated that he is in charge of putting the 53 together. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, frankw said:

Holding our general manager to his words is a "dumb agenda"? Yeah I'm happy about our coaching staff too. I'll be thrilled if and when we draft our QB in the first and develop him. But I can also acknowledge mistakes and not just blame it all on Matt Rhule. You can't handle that because you are smitten with Scott like you've got a personal bromance going with the guy. That isn't consistent with the standard you employed for Marty Hurney and anyone who has read enough of your 130 thousand posts knows this. But you do you and enjoy your weekend 🫶

Oy 😆

No more "smitten" with Fitterer than I "hated" Hurney. I just have an understanding of front office dynamics that you clearly don't.

But keep trying, dude 😎

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

We will probably never no but I suspect why Fitt is still around is because he kept documentation on all of this crap so it landed on Rhule. The next season or two should give us some idea as it has been stated that he is in charge of putting the 53 together. 

This. 

From the outside looking in, it is difficult, if not impossible, to know what role Fitterer played in all the questionable player personnel decisions of Rhule's era.  In order not to throw the baby out with the bathwater it appears that Tepper is giving Scott the benefit of the doubt. 

We may never know the level of responsibility Fitterer played in Darnold's 5th year, Robbie's outrageous contract or the Thomas affair.  All costly self-inflicted wounds.  Perhaps, all we can hope for, with Reich onboard, is that Fitterer finds his groove and the two of them become a successful duo for years to come.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

From the outside looking in, it is difficult, if not impossible, to know what role Fitterer played in all the questionable player personnel decisions of Rhule's era.  In order not to throw the baby out with the bathwater it appears that Tepper is giving Scott the benefit of the doubt. 

We may never know the level of responsibility Fitterer played in Darnold's 5th year, Robbie's outrageous contract or the Thomas affair.  All costly self-inflicted wounds.  Perhaps, all we can hope for, with Reich onboard, is that Fitterer finds his groove and the two of them become a successful duo for years to come.  

There are some things we know from behind the scenes reporting...

Fitterer made the call on the fifth year option, but pretty much everything else quarterback related was Rhule.

It's also been told that if somebody didn't buy in on a particular decision, Rhule would "work to gain their agreement"... which basically translated to badgering them about it until they finally gave in. That way he could say "See, they agreed with me" and, if necessary, pass the buck.

(his post firing interviews have been pretty clear examples of how he operates in terms of taking responsibility) 🙄

In a standard NFL front office, the head coach tells the GM what he needs and the GM does his best to go out and get it. The coaches in such cases generally don't set compensation or trade terms, so it makes for a good check and balance system.

In ours, The head coach had final say. That meant if he wanted a player to stay or be gone, that's what was gonna happen. And while he didn't necessarily set salaries or anything like that, dictating that you had to pay a guy no matter what limits your negotiating options.

So yeah, it's true that we don't know everything that happened, but these are the things we do know.

We also know that the guy who does know everything that went on fired Matt Rhule and handed the responsibility for hiring his replacement over to Scott Fitterer. You can at least infer something from that.

Even now though, you're not looking at a situation where Fitterer just tells Reich "these are the players I'm giving you, deal with it". Both men are known for being very collaborative in their approach (and genuinely so, not Matt Rhule style collaborative) so this time I'd expect it to work like a real NFL front office.

I'd add that a couple of different analysts have mentioned that Tepper really likes Fitterer. When people questioned how safe his position was this past offseason, Josh Klein replied "very" so I don't know how seriously to take the idea that he needs to prove himself.

If the team is a total disaster this year I could understand, but outside of that change doesn't seem likely.

You never know though. Crazier things have happened.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'd add that a couple of different analysts have mentioned that Tepper really likes Fitterer. When people questioned how safe his position was this past offseason, Josh Klein replied "very", so I don't know how seriously to take the idea that he needs to prove himself.

If the team is a total disaster this year I could understand, but outside of that change doesn't seem likely.

You never know though. Crazier things have happened.

We recall that Tepper has voiced unwavering confidence in several advisors over his 5 years of Panthers ownership.  Many, if not most of those people are now gone for failing to meet Dave's expectations.  

Granted, Tepper's learning curve was rather steep 5 years ago and it took less football knowledge to impress the man back then, than it does today.  Notably, in the last year or so Dave's choice of advisors appears to have improved exponentially. 

Fitterer may not be the GM Panthers fans hoped for, but he may be the GM we need.  With a much higher caliber of coaches in the building this season, there will be no place to hide for those who cannot carry their weight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

We recall that Tepper has voiced unwavering confidence in several advisors over his 5 years of Panthers ownership.  Many, if not most of those people are now gone for failing to meet Dave's expectations.  

Granted, Tepper's learning curve was rather steep 5 years ago and it took less football knowledge to impress the man back then, than it does today.  Notably, in the last year or so Dave's choice of advisors appears to have improved exponentially. 

Fitterer may not be the GM Panthers fans hoped for, but he may be the GM we need.  With a much higher caliber of coaches in the building this season, there will be no place to hide for those who cannot carry their weight.

Valid, but I have a hard time buying that he'd give as much leeway as he did in the coaching search to a guy he doesn't fully trust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Valid, but I have a hard time buying that he'd give as much leeway as he did in the coaching search to a guy he doesn't fully trust.

I didn't follow the coaching search as closely as many here, but it left me with the impression that it was conducted by committee, a collaborative effort.  So, I honestly don't know how much credit Fitterer deserves for Reich's hire.

How heavily did Tepper actually rely on Fitterer in comparison to others in the room?  It seems natural that the GM would play a significant role, but at what point did Fitterer's predecessors, Hurney and Rhule, start losing their grip on power?  

Sunlight is the best disinfectant.  No more Hurney, no more Rhule.

Everyone in the Panthers office is playing nicely ATM.  However, if things continue to go sideways, Fitterer may find himself as the odd man out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

I didn't follow the coaching search as closely as many here, but it left me with the impression that it was conducted by committee, a collaborative effort.  So, I honestly don't know how much credit Fitterer deserves for Reich's hire.

How heavily did Tepper actually rely on Fitterer in comparison to others in the room?  It seems natural that the GM would play a significant role, but at what point did Fitterer's predecessors, Hurney and Rhule, start losing their grip on power?  

Sunlight is the best disinfectant.  No more Hurney, no more Rhule.

Everyone in the Panthers office is playing nicely ATM.  However, if things continue to go sideways, Fitterer may find himself as the odd man out. 

I did.

Fitterer ran the search along with Morgan and Samir Suleiman. Tepper and his wife sat in and later added Kristi Coleman.

After the interviews were all done, they asked everyone to vote. Tepper abstained so as not to influence anyone's choice. The expectation was that they'd discuss and perhaps debate the final options.

When everybody voted for Reich, that became moot.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...