Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2023 Charlotte FC Game Thread


MillionDollarCam
 Share

Recommended Posts

I just had a random thought, but I can’t help feeling like what we’re seeing with Lattanzio is what we would’ve seen had the Panthers hired Wilks. Both made commendable runs as interims, improving upon broken cultures from the previous leader. But we’re seeing with Lattanzio that it may just not be sustainable. Kind of wish now that Tepper had treated the FC hire the same way he did with Reich/Panthers and I would be he does going forward 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, MtnJax said:

I just had a random thought, but I can’t help feeling like what we’re seeing with Lattanzio is what we would’ve seen had the Panthers hired Wilks. Both made commendable runs as interims, improving upon broken cultures from the previous leader. But we’re seeing with Lattanzio that it may just not be sustainable. Kind of wish now that Tepper had treated the FC hire the same way he did with Reich/Panthers and I would be he does going forward 

I‘ve never gotten the impression that the players like Lattanzio all that much though. They were just happy to get MAR outta there.

There is something to be said about giving players too much authority on who their coach is. Kinda worried that’s happened with the FC and I could see it if the Panthers had chosen Wilks.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheCasillas said:

meram and Westwood looking like the players we want them to be. Facilitating all over the field and feeding key and clean passes. 
 

having that veteran presence on the field is so key. Takes away the bull rush mentality. 

Vargas is better off the bench too. Fun one. Most organized I’ve seen them.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah they were bad QBs - but QB's that stayed on their teams for several years.  BY is better than all of those. 
    • This is the right move even if you think Bryce isn't the future. Everything except signing him to a long term deal until proven otherwise. There's a decent chance we have a shot to draft a QB next year that we like. 
    • If we're still bad enough that Canales gets fired, especially if it's during the season, there is no way we could ever attract any HC worthy of the job if we told them they had to keep Bryce their first year. That would be 2 coaches he's gotten fired and 4 years of not performing up to par. I still say replace both of them next offseason.  I like Canales the man and I think he's done an absolutely outstanding job at fixing our locker room issues, as it was really bad before he showed up.  But I just don't see it from him with his in game decision making, I think he's held us back just as much as Bryce has, just in different ways. Canales was our Dan Campbell, the coach you hire to turn the franchises culture around for the HC after them to inherit and take to the next level.   The difference was he had some elite coordinators early on and really let him focus on his "leader of men" role as opposed to the X's and O's that Canales does himself and it's turned out well for him.
×
×
  • Create New...