Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 FA WR group..


Sub Zero
 Share

Recommended Posts

Don’t forget the 23 dead cap is a big reason why we started tight. That all trims way back and we’ll be looking at having one of the largest cap space amounts to work with. 

That being said, would be nice to bring in min 1 legit target this year with some rookies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Most, if not all, of those players other than Evans are likely to never hit Free Agency, and when Evans does, he's well past his prime.

Wrong!!

Juedy, Pittman, Aiukey and Higgins could out price their teams.. Cowboys aren’t in a great cap situation either..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Most, if not all, of those players other than Evans are likely to never hit Free Agency, and when Evans does, he's well past his prime.

I'm thinking that Tee Higgins will definitely want to test the market. Jeudy, depending upon how his year goes with the new regime may want to try his luck and get paid elsewhere. It hasn't gone too well in Denver. Honestly, all these guys except for Lamb, Jefferson and maybe Pittman may become available because they're not necessarily even considered ones. As such I don't think they'll likely be tagged. I mean, who wants to pay a two or three, or someone aging (like Evans) top tier money? I guess that Higgins could get tagged because he really could be a one masquerading as a two. But I don't think that the market will be as dry as you think. Some of these guys (maybe even Pittman) are probably going to have a helluva season to get tagged. Otherwise, I see them testing the market.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I'm thinking that Tee Higgins will definitely want to test the market. Jeudy, depending upon how his year goes with the new regime may want to try his luck and get paid elsewhere. It hasn't gone too well in Denver. Honestly, all these guys except for Lamb, Jefferson and maybe Pittman may become available because they're not necessarily even considered ones. As such I don't think they'll likely be tagged. I mean, who wants to pay a two or three, or someone aging (like Evans) top tier money? I guess that Higgins could get tagged because he really could be a one masquerading as a two. But I don't think that the market will be as dry as you think. Some of these guys (maybe even Pittman) are probably going to have a helluva season to get tagged. Otherwise, I see them testing the market.

Higgins sticks out to me because Benglas can’t keep both him and Chase and Higgins wants to prove he is WR1. Why not Carolina?

I would try to make a trade for him now because with him only a year away from FA, the asking price should be lower and you don’t have ti overbid in signing him in FA

Edited by NAS
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can understand the logic. Going for 2 made sense the first time considering how far down we were. Then you don't get it and are basically forced to go for it the second time, too. Way down the list of concerns we have, IMO.
    • Rozeboom needs to get better before he's a JAG.
    • The successful teams in the NFL right now have one thing in common: Patience. Not just with their QB, but with every facet of the program. There are going to be successes and failures, but no one panics and makes reactive decisions. Look at the Eagles, the Bills, the Ravens, the Packers, and hell, even the (newly successful) Lions. All of them showed patience with their QB's growth, let their coaches do their jobs, have drafted well, developed their own players, and plugged holes in their roster and organization with players and situations that made sense. That's what we need. And if that isn't what we have now, we need to make moves to get it there. If that means they need to blow it up to start over, then blow it up and start it over the right way. If that means to change their approach from top to bottom, change it now. But the blueprint of success is out there in the league, teams just think they know better, or they don't have the discipline to follow through.
×
×
  • Create New...