Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 FA WR group..


Sub Zero
 Share

Recommended Posts

Don’t forget the 23 dead cap is a big reason why we started tight. That all trims way back and we’ll be looking at having one of the largest cap space amounts to work with. 

That being said, would be nice to bring in min 1 legit target this year with some rookies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Most, if not all, of those players other than Evans are likely to never hit Free Agency, and when Evans does, he's well past his prime.

Wrong!!

Juedy, Pittman, Aiukey and Higgins could out price their teams.. Cowboys aren’t in a great cap situation either..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Most, if not all, of those players other than Evans are likely to never hit Free Agency, and when Evans does, he's well past his prime.

I'm thinking that Tee Higgins will definitely want to test the market. Jeudy, depending upon how his year goes with the new regime may want to try his luck and get paid elsewhere. It hasn't gone too well in Denver. Honestly, all these guys except for Lamb, Jefferson and maybe Pittman may become available because they're not necessarily even considered ones. As such I don't think they'll likely be tagged. I mean, who wants to pay a two or three, or someone aging (like Evans) top tier money? I guess that Higgins could get tagged because he really could be a one masquerading as a two. But I don't think that the market will be as dry as you think. Some of these guys (maybe even Pittman) are probably going to have a helluva season to get tagged. Otherwise, I see them testing the market.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I'm thinking that Tee Higgins will definitely want to test the market. Jeudy, depending upon how his year goes with the new regime may want to try his luck and get paid elsewhere. It hasn't gone too well in Denver. Honestly, all these guys except for Lamb, Jefferson and maybe Pittman may become available because they're not necessarily even considered ones. As such I don't think they'll likely be tagged. I mean, who wants to pay a two or three, or someone aging (like Evans) top tier money? I guess that Higgins could get tagged because he really could be a one masquerading as a two. But I don't think that the market will be as dry as you think. Some of these guys (maybe even Pittman) are probably going to have a helluva season to get tagged. Otherwise, I see them testing the market.

Higgins sticks out to me because Benglas can’t keep both him and Chase and Higgins wants to prove he is WR1. Why not Carolina?

I would try to make a trade for him now because with him only a year away from FA, the asking price should be lower and you don’t have ti overbid in signing him in FA

Edited by NAS
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...