Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Free Agent Updates


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Carl Spackler said:

Have you spoken with every scout, assistant GM, GM, Director of Player Personnel and VP about this subject? 

I have four objective rounds of evidence of him not being a top two rounder. I have two of those for Corral.

It's kind of amazing that you can't wrap your head around something that literally happened.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

I have four objective rounds of evidence of him not being a top two rounder. I have two of those for Corral.

It's kind of amazing that you can't wrap your head around something that literally happened.

You’re literally just being a dick and arguing for the sake of it now. What I said (he was expected to go in the first two rounds) is an accurate statement. At least one team had a first-round grade on him.

1DC1D5EC-093A-47D2-A889-978DF6401F40.jpeg

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Carl Spackler said:

You’re literally just being a dick and arguing for the sake of it now. What I said (he was expected to go in the first two rounds) is an accurate statement. At least one team had a first-round grade on him.

1DC1D5EC-093A-47D2-A889-978DF6401F40.jpeg

The media isn't an NFL front office. They prove that every draft. 

The fact that we supposedly had three QB's as first rounders isn't a point in anyone's favor considering how lightspeed stupid we were under Rhule.

Also, how am I being a dick about explained, what literally happened?

Corral wasn't a top two round QB.

That's not something abstract, you buffoon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

The media isn't an NFL front office. They prove that every draft. 

The fact that we supposedly had three QB's as first rounders isn't a point in anyone's favor considering how lightspeed stupid we were under Rhule.

Also, how am I being a dick about explained, what literally happened?

Corral wasn't a top two round QB.

That's not something abstract, you buffoon.

Sorry, I had no idea you're not a native English speaker.

I never said he was a top two round QB, I said he was projected to be and thus proved it. You didn't speak with every front-office person. You don't know what the hell they thought, so you tried passing your opinion off as fact. He ultimately didn't go in the top two rounds, no poo, but that's not what I said. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...