Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draft visit news


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

It's just connecting the dots between the players we've acquired and what has been said by our new staff about our defensive scheme.

No one is saying he WILL be traded. People have just said it could happen because we've made moves that have made him expendable (signing Von Bell), Fitts has already told us you can't re-sign everyone, Fitts is a wheeler and dealer, and on the surface Chinn doesn't really fit in great into this defensive scheme given the little that we know about it.

It's the offseason, what else is their to talk about? Shall we argue some more about QBs?

My dad can beat up your dad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

It's just connecting the dots between the players we've acquired and what has been said by our new staff about our defensive scheme.

No one is saying he WILL be traded. People have just said it could happen because we've made moves that have made him expendable (signing Von Bell), Fitts has already told us you can't re-sign everyone, Fitts is a wheeler and dealer, and on the surface Chinn doesn't really fit in great into this defensive scheme given the little that we know about it.

It's the offseason, what else is their to talk about? Shall we argue some more about QBs?

I wonder what his value is?  2nd?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Kaye noticed the same thing I did...

 

We're all over CBs because of injuries. The same is probably true with the OGs. Sometimes the best ability is availability.

Speculating a little deeper... if you're gonna have a short QB, you better have a STRONG interior OL. Pressure up the middle is a killer for short QBs. They can't see over it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

We're all over CBs because of injuries. The same is probably true with the OGs. Sometimes the best ability is availability.

Someone asked him about Christensen. He stated that he believes he'll stick around for his versatility as a backup but acknowledges it's possible the Panthers could draft someone to start over him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Someone asked him about Christensen. He stated that he believes he'll stick around for his versatility as a backup but acknowledges it's possible the Panthers could draft someone to start over him.

With BC's versatility, he'd still be a very valuable all purpose backup along the OL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • too old, too expensive and would take draft capital
    • I saw the list, agree Minshew would be on the list of possible guys as well as the rest of the list.  Mac Jones would probably be the highest possible target though that would require a trade. All that said, heres a darkhorse that I wouldnt be surprised...Carson Wentz.  I know he looked rough his last time out, however he was clearly pretty dangerously injured and kept playing through it.  When he was healthy in Minnesota he looked pretty fricken good.  Last full season he started he threw for 3500, 27td, 7 INT.  He did start the next season for a washington team running a scheme that does not fit him.  I think the things that Canales is looking for his QB to do, that Wentz does well.   Wentz however with his age would not be any kind of long term solution, a decent backup but more like actual competition would be needed to go into the season.  
    • This reads as someone trying to suggest changes while treading lightly so Daddy Tepper doesn’t come down too hard on them.  Because flatly, the problem is Bryce.  I don’t think Canales is a perfect coach, but you can see the limitations in what can be called, what is called, and the amount of times Bryce fugs up plays all by himself.  Someone brought up the bootlegs being useless because there is always a free defender rushing - think about how different that play looks with a 6’2”+ QB with a strong arm and mobility.  I can’t count the number of times Bryce has thrown and missed bc he can’t see, it gets deflected, he chucks it away, or his patented run and fumble just on bootlegs and roll outs.  By percentage of those plays per player I have ever watched, Bryce has more negative plays WITHOUT A fuging DOUBT than anyone I have ever watched before.  Like an uncanny ability to fug up the simplest of things.  I have never seen anything like it.  And then, as I mentioned in the other thread, when you string those seemingly one-off plays together, and those stack over the course of a game, poo looks really disjointed.  It is Bryce.  Enough of this nebulous ass “something’s afoot!” bullshit.
×
×
  • Create New...