Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What the McGinn Article Says


WUnderhill
 Share

Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Could it be that the S2 could be an indicator  of not just success  but, more importantly, of a lack of success? 


My understanding is the S2 is an indicator that someone has the cognitive tools for success.

It can’t predict success because a guy also has to have athletic ability, drive, work ethic, etc. It’s rumored Fields is missing some of these.

However, without the right cognitive tools, you have no chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Tbe said:


My understanding is the S2 is an indicator that someone has the cognitive tools for success.

It can’t predict success because a guy also has to have athletic ability, drive, work ethic, etc. It’s rumored Fields is missing some of these.

However, without the right cognitive tools, you have no chance.

It is a performance based test that measures processing speed.  So yes, it is cognitive in that it involves split second decisions the way I understand it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Tbe said:


My understanding is the S2 is an indicator that someone has the cognitive tools for success.

It can’t predict success because a guy also has to have athletic ability, drive, work ethic, etc. It’s rumored Fields is missing some of these.

However, without the right cognitive tools, you have no chance.

I guess thats whst I was getting at. It can help point to who has what it takes to succeed, but also who, cognitively, is going  to struggle  the most. 

Most of what I've seen is that those who do well have higher scores. Those who struggle the most have lower scores. I just am surprised that CJ is supposed  to have a lower score.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

It is a performance based test that measures processing speed.  So yes, it is cognitive in that it involves split second decisions the way I understand it.

It measures a lot more than processing speed. 

It has 9 parts.

Another key part of the test is measuring how many objects you can keep track of at once. Think WR and defenders running around.

If you can process fast but can’t keep track of where everyone is on the field, you won’t be very good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I miss many of the OGs like @ladypanther Zob had a bad off week and came in here to do some mopping and a couple of the 10 year 15k post account he just banned over a silly disagreement, just odd behavior from Zob. A Pessimal deal happened with Lady and others. I tired to find a new forum and could not get around the signing up part...same for discord. Its not perfect here by any means, but I still feel welcomed here for the most part and this place does have the most freedom. I hate how the right vs left BS nearly cooked this place, I still believe in removing the litterbox, toxic as hell and lollolols @ anyone coming into a team forum to talk about pointless politics of the uni party turds.  @Bear Hands you saved this place with your activity. It helped offset the lost of OGs and the knowledgeable that leftd.    It would help for new members and I do get the spammers deals, just got to mod them away and hope opening the door brings in fresh blood. 
    • Young went to bama and Brissett went to nc state.
    • That seems about right. No higher than that for a bottom third qb with two years left, including one expensive year. He played well enough last year to show he is startable. It depends on whether other teams thought he has any upside left and whether he's been hindered by coaching and surrounding cast. I think most teams would answer no, but if they thought he could step it up just a little I could see trading a fourth or fifth for a bridge guy/top tier backup.
×
×
  • Create New...