Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hall of Famer Bill Parcells on Bryce Young's Size: 'He Better Walk on Water'


Recommended Posts

The trends show that average player weight in particular is dropping across the board. Height is a factor still primarily for purposes of pass defense and pass offense. There was also a time when backs under 5’ 10” was considered somewhat problematic. Certainly a time when a WR couldn’t be shorter than 6’1 or so. In modern times, there aren’t hardly any Top 25 WR that are taller than 6’2”. Chase, Hill, etc. being right at or under 6’. It’s a speed game now. 
 

when we talk about QB speed, it’s not about how fast they run. It’s about speed of processing, speed of release, speed of identifying blitzes, and speed of getting the ball out of their hands. Bryce is almost inarguably the top available in all those categories. Stroud is an amazing prospect and his size makes you feel a lot better about his chances, but Russell Wilson and Kyler Murray have both won games in this league. Drew Brees won games. In bygone times, teams wouldn’t even consider allowing a player under 6’ to win their QB job no matter what. Parcells is from that school. It’s an antiquated position. The point is that if you’re special, you’re an exception. Bryce Young is special. Imagine the difference between a basketball player that was 6’10” and dominant and a team refusing to draft them because there was another player who in most respects was seen as inferior, but was 6’11.5. Get a ruler out and visualize how much 1 inch and 1/8th actually is and see if you should define a player on that. To me, the hand measurements are a bigger concern by and large because they make a play by play impact on ball security and off schedule throws. That isn’t the issue here. 
 

Seattle put forth the blueprint. Have a line full of big nasties and in combination with the rules regarding touching the QB, it shouldn’t be a career altering problem. Again, it’s more about speed from snap to release than it is about 40 time. NFL offenses are run now to move at high percentage and not entirely by long developing plays down the field. Luke was talking about this and talked about how frustrating it was to never be able to touch Brees because the ball was already gone. That’s the same type of football brain you have here and the testing supports it. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SameDamnThing said:

when we talk about QB speed, it’s not about how fast they run. It’s about speed of processing, speed of release, speed of identifying blitzes, and speed of getting the ball out of their hands. Bryce is almost inarguably the top available in all those categories. 

Where are you seeing the stat he has the best release throwing the football in this class and speed of getting the ball out of his hands? One of the things he is praised for is not giving up on plays and hanging onto the ball while scrambling looking for something to open up. Which is great in college, for his running speed, but we will see how well that translates to doing that against NFL defenders. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SameDamnThing said:

The trends show that average player weight in particular is dropping across the board. Height is a factor still primarily for purposes of pass defense and pass offense. There was also a time when backs under 5’ 10” was considered somewhat problematic. Certainly a time when a WR couldn’t be shorter than 6’1 or so. In modern times, there aren’t hardly any Top 25 WR that are taller than 6’2”. Chase, Hill, etc. being right at or under 6’. It’s a speed game now. 
 

when we talk about QB speed, it’s not about how fast they run. It’s about speed of processing, speed of release, speed of identifying blitzes, and speed of getting the ball out of their hands. Bryce is almost inarguably the top available in all those categories. Stroud is an amazing prospect and his size makes you feel a lot better about his chances, but Russell Wilson and Kyler Murray have both won games in this league. Drew Brees won games. In bygone times, teams wouldn’t even consider allowing a player under 6’ to win their QB job no matter what. Parcells is from that school. It’s an antiquated position. The point is that if you’re special, you’re an exception. Bryce Young is special. Imagine the difference between a basketball player that was 6’10” and dominant and a team refusing to draft them because there was another player who in most respects was seen as inferior, but was 6’11.5. Get a ruler out and visualize how much 1 inch and 1/8th actually is and see if you should define a player on that. To me, the hand measurements are a bigger concern by and large because they make a play by play impact on ball security and off schedule throws. That isn’t the issue here. 
 

Seattle put forth the blueprint. Have a line full of big nasties and in combination with the rules regarding touching the QB, it shouldn’t be a career altering problem. Again, it’s more about speed from snap to release than it is about 40 time. NFL offenses are run now to move at high percentage and not entirely by long developing plays down the field. Luke was talking about this and talked about how frustrating it was to never be able to touch Brees because the ball was already gone. That’s the same type of football brain you have here and the testing supports it. 

It's not about how fast they run it's the fact that a guy like Corral statistically is a better QB AND can run the rock. THATS the modern game.

Don't worry, someone will show you with AR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, MechaZain said:

Extending plays in and out of the pocket? Have you read or seen anything about him? His game’s compared mostly to Mahomes and Wilson are they old school pocket passers too?

Any NFL DC worth his paycheck can take that away. Then what? He's not Kyler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Public service. Getting us SB ready, not set back on an experiment with the smallest instead of experimenting with the biggest.

I have more time to poke holes in fanboy theory these days...

top gun deal with it GIF

Talk to Steve Smith.

 

576719BF-48E0-42D9-A68E-420CDBD22CA8.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Varking said:

Where are you seeing the stat he has the best release throwing the football in this class and speed of getting the ball out of his hands? One of the things he is praised for is not giving up on plays and hanging onto the ball while scrambling looking for something to open up. Which is great in college, for his running speed, but we will see how well that translates to doing that against NFL defenders. 

It’s not really a stat in traditional sense. But scouts have long been discussing his quick progressions, throwing mechanics, and decision making. Most QB guys I’ve seen scout him talk about the mechanics as being really strong. If he holds the ball too long that will have to be coached out of him if possible. Honestly there’s a lot about Bryce that will be trial and error to see if it translates, but nobody is questioning his football brain. To me, that’s a really strong base. I think Stroud has one as well despite the testing stuff, but it hasn’t been touted at the same level as Bryce. I think both will be good players but Bryce has special potential that’s almost intangible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...