Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

He was different there will never be another “him”!!


WOW!!
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

I knew it! 

I always knew it!

best friend clapping GIF

Looks like you quoted me just in time. They're going through my posts trying to scrub the evidence.

Just kidding, who would scrub my posts? LOL, there's no evidence to be scrubbed. No one else told me to ban you. There is no collusion. Only Bryce Young. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

The Richardson thing is based in the idea that you can take a super athlete who's only got raw quarterbacking skills and train him to play the position just as well as someone who has all the skills already.

It's what the 49ers believed when they took Trey Lance.

He's a superior specimen to Lance, absolutely no comparison.

He reads the field we'll, very good pocket movement for someone 21yrs old, dope ars S2.

The S2 makes him better than Bryce. He's bigger, faster, can "process" too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frank Reich and co.can fix that little "accuracy" thing they talk about, it's not Rivera, Shula after all.

This is the closest "replacement" in thirteen years. Only thing more promising is Drake Maye next year.

Can't pass on a big boy. Panthers front office aren't blinded by sports agency media.

TD said they are enamored.

It's love. Don't knock it until you try it.

We(Me & PanthersHQ) don't have to explain to you Brycers why we love AR. You'll find out at the podium.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rayzor said:

Yes, they love AR. They love his potential probably more than any other QB. But they like what Young brings right away. Love for AR has to do with potential. Love for Young has to do with what he brings day 1. Both have room for growth as a QB, but Young is just well ahead of AR in terms of what they bring as a QB right away. 

50 cent sour brite crawlers GIF by Trolli

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Looks like you quoted me just in time. They're going through my posts trying to scrub the evidence.

Just kidding, who would scrub my posts? LOL, there's no evidence to be scrubbed. No one else told me to ban you. There is no collusion. Only Bryce Young. 

You're having way too much fun with this 😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'd say the "dum dums" are the ones who think you can make a choice like that strictly by looking at a physical comparison.

Thankfully, our people dug a little deeper than that.

It's football not futbol. Put AR, Young in a schoolyard have them pick teams.

No hyperbole, no tape. Football. Who will they pick Scot.

I'm not ignoring the painful truth here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, rippadonn said:

It's football not futbol. Put AR, Young in a schoolyard have them pick teams.

No hyperbole, no tape. Football. Who will they pick Scot.

I'm not ignoring the painful truth here.

I think I'd trust who an actual NFL GM would pick over a kid in a schoolyard.

You're basing pretty much your entire argument on physical traits. There is way more to playing quarterback in the NFL than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that's totally fair to say, but I think it also shows you guys are conflating what I'm saying with thinking I'm saying something like, "T-Mac will 100% have a better NFL career than Chark had" which is a completely different statement and one I'd agree, you can't really say about any NFL player before they've ever taken a snap. Because what I'm saying, is that T-Mac's actual ability and skills right now, are at a higher level than Chark's ever were, it's a completely different statement that is independent of what his NFL output will be. But even with those other prospects, I'm sure some of them before their NFL career started, still had more ability and physical talent than Chark had, because again, this is so much less about T-Mac and so much more about Chark.  A bad coach, system, QB, injuries, etc, that derail a WR's career no matter how good they may have been and is much more of the reason they were a bust than their own abilities.   Chark was a tall WR with little WR speed, he was a deep ball threat and wasn't even particularly great at it, he was not that good of an actual WR. If the Jags had another above average WR in 2019, then Chark doesn't get his 1k season that I think people are getting too hung up on in thinking he was some great player in this league.
    • I've just seen enough highly touted prospects who pretty much everyone was high on end up busting to assume anything.
    • Maybe, but a player can also bust for a lot of reasons.  And I'm not about to go look up the stats of all the 1st round WR busts, but I'd be surprised if they had the sustained output and success in college that T-Mac had.  Those early WR busts are usually guys who had one breakout season and then were highly drafted because of physical potential, not already built out ability. I'm not even saying T-Mac is 100% going to have a better career than Chark (although I obviously think he will). I'm just saying that right now, his skill level and ability is better than Chark's ever was, and I don't understand how anyone is arguing against that, not because of T-Mac, but because of who Chark himself was.   If you want to take the argument that you can't say ANY player who hasn't played a down yet can't be considered better than someone who has, then so be it (even though I'd say that's a dumb stance anyways). At his peak ability, Chark was more like a #3 WR than anything else, he was the definition of a league average WR.  If you don't think a Top 10 selected WR with his tape is better than that just because they haven't played in the NFL yet, then you're just stuck on the "he hasn't played a down yet" idea and can't evaluate them as players and abilities.
×
×
  • Create New...