Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will Levis Draft Odds?


joemac
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, jayboogieman said:

Don't really care about stats or percentages. The only stats that really matters are the TD stat and wins. Young whipped Corral's butt in both of those.

 

Stats and percentage is the only good way to predict future performance.

Youngs stats don't indicate a better career than a dual threat Corral who has a running component to his game much like Cam, Levis, AR.

Why would the Panthers bring in a QB at the opposite spectrum. The media told y'all that. TD said they loved AR.

If AR and Bryce had a baby it would be Will Levis.

Compromise without great loss.

Will is a much better QB than even his stats say in comparison to frontrunner school QBs with everything at their fingertips.

Will had to work harder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Stats and percentage is the only good way to predict future performance.

Youngs stats don't indicate a better career than a dual threat Corral who has a running component to his game much like Cam, Levis, AR.

Why would the Panthers bring in a QB at the opposite spectrum. The media told y'all that. TD said they loved AR.

If AR and Bryce had a baby it would be Will Levis.

Compromise without great loss.

Will is a much better QB than even his stats say in comparison to frontrunner school QBs with everything at their fingertips.

Will had to work harder.

Boy, you're dug in like a tick with the Young hate.😉

Last thing I'm going to address is why the Panthers would bring in a QB "at the opposite spectrum."

Perhaps they feel that such a QB is the best option to do what they want.

Anyway, have a good one. I need to get back to writing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I saw an interesting point the other day about our type of situation.  It could have been wise to hold him off for 1-2 weeks, but that would not have anything to do with Bryce and you could easily communicate that from a PR standpoint.   Why? Well, we just brought an entirely new staff into town, new offense for the returning OL, and had wholesale turnover elsewhere.  So just run Dalton out there the first game or so to see how things are shaking out.  Dry run to make sure we won't kill the kid.  We weren't eyeing the SB.  Get a sense of the line, the receivers, the playbook.  It gives you a glimpse of what Bryce would be stepping into and a good barometer on where things stood sans him.  I suppose we sort of did that with Dalton, but that was a reactive switch and like @Ricky Spanish mentioned, it was against an injured SEA defense where we threw a ridiculous amount.  Who knows, maybe we could have at least won a game or two more that way.  You can adjustments prior to Bryce stepping in, better tee it up for him, and maybe we end up winning game 1 or 2. Last year was such a sh*tshow.  One of the worst seasons I've ever experienced in any sport for any team.  Absolutely nothing made sense together.  Happy we cut the cord early, but should have never hired that crew in the first place.   
    • Johnson is gonna want $20M+ next year. That's why they should have drafted Ladd.
    • It's like folk didn't even watch the game. Dalton took a beating, and barely avoided a lot more violent hits. No 35 years old QB is going to survive a season like that. Imagine him against Dallas or Houston or Indy or Detroit or New Orleans twice! He played better than Bryce in that 1 game, but he wouldn't have lasted half the season. 
×
×
  • Create New...