Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Albert Breer's Annual Mock


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

The 33rd Team's mock by Rick Spielman and Mike Tannenbaum...

Oddly enough, the top four quarterbacks end up in the same places Breer put them, with one slight adjustment. They have Hendon Hooker going ahead of Richardson (#18 to the Lions)

Meanwhile Ben Albright mirrors Tony Pauline.

Some consensus type things going on here 😳

Also, this from Albright on the Cardinals...

 

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be a bit surprised at Richardson to the Bucs. There's a fair amount of talk about how Mayfield will be just fine with the wrs they have, or that Trask should have a fair shot of being the starter. I think tackle might be more of need for them. There could be a deal with White asking for a trade recently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, UnluckyforSome said:

I would be a bit surprised at Richardson to the Bucs. There's a fair amount of talk about how Mayfield will be just fine with the wrs they have...

Technically, that's one of the arguments for taking a guy who might not be ready for a year or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

I mean I guess it's possible Huston trades down. I have heard rumors floated that everyone wants to trade down but I've not heard any about another team wanting to trade up.

It'd be interesting to know if a team ever wanted to trade down so much that they had to sweeten offers (not sure what that would look like) to entice teams to trade up...maybe it's never happened before. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And finally, Daniel Jeremiah...

DJ is one of the few guys I've seen in the last 24 hours to have more than two quarterbacks in the top ten. Besides Young at #1, he's got Stroud second to the Texans and Levis going to the Colts with the fourth spot.

What he does share with the others though is a belief that Richardson drops out of the top half of the round. He has him being picked 20th overall by Seattle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, UnluckyforSome said:

It is. I don't disagree on that. I would more say, at least what I've been reading on JoeBucsFan, is a little bit of let's give Trask a try or was that just wasted pick.

Is Mayfield there on more than a one year deal (don't remember)?

Either way, apparently the reason why Richardson is falling Is that personnel guys are having a hard time figuring out where he fits.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Is Mayfield there on more than a one year deal (don't remember)?

Either way, apparently the reason why Richardson is falling Is that personnel guys are having a hard time figuring out where he fits.

 

I'm pretty certain it's a 1 year deal. I'm delighted at seeing a division rival flop, but the combo of Mayfield and Trask might be bad enough to get them to the top of the draft or near enough. Robinson has been linked to them, and I think they would take him if he was there, but I don't know how they can't go online otherwise. That unit was not good last year with age and injury. Pass rush is just as big a need. They have none.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No. Physical tools alone aren't enough. There are plenty of examples of draft busts to support that. Aost all of them had the physical tools and that wasn't enough. But Bryce is a perfect example of the opposite. Absolutely elite intangibles aren't enough either. If you simply don't have the physical abilities all the football intelligence and work ethic in the world won't be enough to overcome it. Just look to the sidelines every Sunday. We call those people "coaches".
    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
    • If you plug Bryce onto the Pro Bowl roster you might have a chance to compete for a SB. If he's surrounded by top tier talent with a top tier defense on the other side, a field flipping punter, and a kicker good from 60+ you might have a chance. But that means you basically have to recreate Saban's Bama in the NFL and that's impossible... and Bryce couldn't win a championship in that environment either. What the Panthers didn't realize when they got so obsessed with his "PG mentality" was that what they were looking st was a "barely checks the box PG". The basketball equivalent of Bryce would be an undersized PG with marginal athleticism who can make the basic plays but adds nothing to the team in terms of elevating the overall team. Not a great shooter, not a great defender, not a great driver. Just a guy who can basically get you into the offense and be a matador on defense. Basically a placeholder while you look to upgrade the PG position. 
×
×
  • Create New...