Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If the Cardinals can have back to back winning seasons

pstall

By pstall,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

meh....they haven't done it since the mid 80's and then it seems they only pull it off once every decade.

it's teams like that that give me hope. you know....maybe after we have been around 40 years or so we can finally have back to back winning seasons...maybe even get a ring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CharlotteBeer.com Newbie

CharlotteBeer.com

Posted
Posted

Kurt Warner, larry fitzgerald, anquan boldin, steve breaston. enough said. not to mention antrell rolle, Andrian Wilson, Darnell Dockett, and Karlos Dansby.

who is their personnel Director??

I think we have as talented a roster as any team in the league.

Case in point: overall, we have a better roster than this year's Patriots. Does that mean we're going to win this Sunday?

Of course not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CharlotteBeer.com Newbie

CharlotteBeer.com

Posted
Posted

The Cards werent content with bringing with 21 of 22 starters back..They made changes.despite going to the super bowl.

What did we do...we gave out huge extensions.

The Cardinals saw more changes in their coaching staff than they did players.

Most of their offseason consisted of resigning key players, most notably Warner and Boldin, but several other players resigned.

I don't think they made as many personnel changes as you think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

Most of the changes they made were to their coaching staff, some by design and others by default. It isn't like we didn't overhaul our defensive staff as well. As for a quarterback, they brought back a guy with a history of injury and inconsistency over the last 5 years who is 4 years older than Jake. They haven't been exactly dynamic in their changes and so far have been lucky in the injury department. i didn't see anyone of their starters on IR on NFL.com.

As for comparisons, I certainly wouldn't look to the cardinals as a model for our team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
scpanther22 Mentor

scpanther22

Posted
Posted

The Cardinals saw more changes in their coaching staff than they did players.

Most of their offseason consisted of resigning key players, most notably Warner and Boldin, but several other players resigned.

I don't think they made as many personnel changes as you think.

what are you talking about..lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CharlotteBeer.com Newbie

CharlotteBeer.com

Posted
Posted

The Cards werent content with bringing with 21 of 22 starters back..They made changes.despite going to the super bowl.

What did we do...we gave out huge extensions.

what are you talking about..lol

Did I stutter?

;)

Seriously though, they didn't do a whole lot in the offseason personnelwise compared with the Panthers. Both teams saw more changes with coaches than players, and there were more resignings than there were new acquisitions.

If you think otherwise, tell me why.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
scpanther22 Mentor

scpanther22

Posted
Posted

Did I stutter?

;)

Seriously though, they didn't do a whole lot in the offseason personnelwise compared with the Panthers. Both teams saw more changes with coaches than players, and there were more resignings than there were new acquisitions.

If you think otherwise, tell me why.

I agree with you.I was just saying the panthers sat on bringing 21 of 22 starters back all season.the cards at least did somthing on purpose

But when did Boldin resign?I think he still wants out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • rebelrouser
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...