Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFC rankings from The Athletic


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

NFL executives rank the teams

The Panthers rank 10th, making them the second highest team from the NFC South. Only the Saints are higher at 6th. The Falcons and Bucs are 13th and 14th respectively.

The top five are the Eagles, 49ers, Lions (yes, Lions) Cowboys (😒) and Seahawks.

Rounding out the bottom along with the aforementioned NFC South teams are the Bears (12th) Rams (15th) an dof course, the Cardinals.

Ranking just above the Panthers at #9, Ron Rivera and the Commanders 😕

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ladypanther said:

Based on the avg rank...looks like the Panthers should be ahead of Washington.  Every other team rank is by that avg.

image.png.d13e0a18c4e4413c9825937a6f6623a8.png

Yeah, they used the median and not mean for the rankings 🧐

dumb but meh, better rankings than I thought. Shows no one really knows how the panthers are gonna be

Edited by Panthercougar68
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Yeah, they used the median and not mean for the rankings 🧐

dumb but meh, better rankings than I thought. Shows no one really knows how the panthers are gonna be

Median lessens affect of outliers in data. At least that's what was drilled in to my head by Six Sigma. God thats an old memory 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...