Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB School: Bryce Young - Week 1 @ Falcons


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Finally watched. Definitely not encouraging but not really about Bryce. I feel a lot better about that second INT for sure. If JT isn't concerned about that, I have no reason to be.

Boy we might be in trouble if we don't see some scheme adjustments. We definitely need Chark back, obviously.

Being able to scare Atlanta deep might have been the difference between a win and loss last week.  Bates straight up said they didn't have to worry about that and could just jump routes across the middle all day.

Our only serious deep threat is the aforementioned Chark and unfortunately he's always injured.  Some deep speed needs to be a priority this next offseason.

btw you know it's Panthers football time when we're talking about next year in September

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

Being able to scare Atlanta deep might have been the difference between a win and loss last week.  Bates straight up said they didn't have to worry about that and could just jump routes across the middle all day.

Our only serious deep threat is the aforementioned Chark and unfortunately he's always injured.  Some deep speed needs to be a priority this next offseason.

btw you know it's Panthers football time when we're talking about next year in September

Yeah, I mean the reality is that plenty of people did bring up the lackluster attention to WR in the offseason. I didn't think it was going to be this bad but we obviously are going to have to get a lot more creative to get some favorable matchups.

The lack of talent and ability at WR is going to make us pretty easy to defend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Finally watched. Definitely not encouraging but not really about Bryce. I feel a lot better about that second INT for sure. If JT isn't concerned about that, I have no reason to be.

Boy we might be in trouble if we don't see some scheme adjustments. We definitely need Chark back, obviously.

I like his breakdowns but he definitely carries a lot of bias. If it was a QB he already had a negative opinion about he would've skewered him for throwing late across the middle and just absolutely trashed him for making the same mistake twice in one game leading to INTs both times. Not to mention bashing him for missing Thielen wide open multiple times. That's still baffling to me. Thielen was getting wide open often, Bryce wasn't throwing him the ball, and JT bashes Thielen for this? Wild.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/13/2023 at 11:11 PM, Proudiddy said:

Haven't finished it yet, but hard to get through it.  I don't see anything encouraging.  Staring receivers down, misplaced/bad throws, suddenly little to no feel for anticipation, bad decisions, etc.  

The sunshine and rainbows brigade keep wanting to cite it being his first game - outside of a couple of secondary players and maybe Grady Jarrett, the Falcons defense is ASS and Bryce looked horrible.  And again, outside of the injury AR looked better.  I think Stroud played better.  And we saw Cam dominate and take the league by storm from his first game on.  First game isn't an excuse, especially for a #1 overall pick.  You draft a guy #1 because they should step on the field and change the game in your favor from the first snap...

It's just very discouraging that every facet of his game that our staff felt made him the #1 overall pick over the other options are all areas he looked mediocre in for most of the game Sunday.

Cam lost his first two games and had Steve Smith to go get balls and Greg Olsen.  This team has nothing close to a Steve Smith or Olsen at that point in their careers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, parker said:

Cam lost his first two games and had Steve Smith to go get balls and Greg Olsen.  This team has nothing close to a Steve Smith or Olsen at that point in their careers.

Olsen barely had over 500 yards his first year here while splitting time with Shockey. He didn't start becoming the Olsen we know until his second year here and truly blossomed starting year four.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I like his breakdowns but he definitely carries a lot of bias. If it was a QB he already had a negative opinion about he would've skewered him for throwing late across the middle and just absolutely trashed him for making the same mistake twice in one game leading to INTs both times. Not to mention bashing him for missing Thielen wide open multiple times. That's still baffling to me. Thielen was getting wide open often, Bryce wasn't throwing him the ball, and JT bashes Thielen for this? Wild.

I didn't see Thielen getting open often live. I haven't gone back to re-watch it though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I like his breakdowns but he definitely carries a lot of bias. If it was a QB he already had a negative opinion about he would've skewered him for throwing late across the middle and just absolutely trashed him for making the same mistake twice in one game leading to INTs both times. Not to mention bashing him for missing Thielen wide open multiple times. That's still baffling to me. Thielen was getting wide open often, Bryce wasn't throwing him the ball, and JT bashes Thielen for this? Wild.

Yeah I also sorta feel like JT gets the benefit of the doubt from the masses because he was once part of an exclusive club. Doesn't necessarily mean he always knows what he's talking about. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I like his breakdowns but he definitely carries a lot of bias. If it was a QB he already had a negative opinion about he would've skewered him for throwing late across the middle and just absolutely trashed him for making the same mistake twice in one game leading to INTs both times. Not to mention bashing him for missing Thielen wide open multiple times. That's still baffling to me. Thielen was getting wide open often, Bryce wasn't throwing him the ball, and JT bashes Thielen for this? Wild.

That's the part a lot of people keep overlooking.  JT no doubt knows how to break film down and analyze what he's looking at, but that doesn't mean what he shares is impartial, bc it definitely is.  I've watched several of his videos over the years and the way he spins a mistake for one guy, versus skewering another for the same thing is obvious.  He likes Bryce.  It's why I have a hard time digesting him still praising him for anticipation from week 1 when a ton of his throws were late.  He does it in one of the early throws to Hurst across the middle in this breakdown - it was late, behind him, and inaccurate, and iirc, between two defenders, and JT says something like it was a good decision, just a tad behind him and a little late.  Well, then how does that make it a good throw?  Nothing about that was a good throw.

Now, again, I'm not saying all this to trash Bryce or say he's a bust bc I'm not.  But what I am saying is, a lot of the stuff JT was praising him for in week 1 was not legitimate, it's really bc he likes him and wants him to succeed.  He might be qualified and a professional at what he does, but that doesn't mean he isn't biased.  Front office guys are professionals and they make mistakes all of the time based off of biases and preferences.  People saw for years that healthy Cam was revolutionizing the game and the only thing that could stop him was himself or injury in his prime, and yet, there were countless ex-players and pundits that went out of their way his entire career to trash him and criticize him for how he played.  Just saying...  these experts aren't always looking through clear, objective lenses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

That's the part a lot of people keep overlooking.  JT no doubt knows how to break film down and analyze what he's looking at, but that doesn't mean what he shares is impartial, bc it definitely is.  I've watched several of his videos over the years and the way he spins a mistake for one guy, versus skewering another for the same thing is obvious.  He likes Bryce.  It's why I have a hard time digesting him still praising him for anticipation from week 1 when a ton of his throws were late.  He does it in one of the early throws to Hurst across the middle in this breakdown - it was late, behind him, and inaccurate, and iirc, between two defenders, and JT says something like it was a good decision, just a tad behind him and a little late.  Well, then how does that make it a good throw?  Nothing about that was a good throw.

Now, again, I'm not saying all this to trash Bryce or say he's a bust bc I'm not.  But what I am saying is, a lot of the stuff JT was praising him for in week 1 was not legitimate, it's really bc he likes him and wants him to succeed.  He might be qualified and a professional at what he does, but that doesn't mean he isn't biased.  Front office guys are professionals and they make mistakes all of the time based off of biases and preferences.  People saw for years that healthy Cam was revolutionizing the game and the only thing that could stop him was himself or injury in his prime, and yet, there were countless ex-players and pundits that went out of their way his entire career to trash him and criticize him for how he played.  Just saying...  these experts aren't always looking through clear, objective lenses.

Once folks have made up their minds about something it's really hard for them to sway their opinion. I was wrong about Herbert. I was wrong about Josh Allen. It looks like I was probably wrong about Justin Fields. I was wrong about Micah Parsons. It happens. Everyone is wrong sometimes.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Olsen barely had over 500 yards his first year here while splitting time with Shockey. He didn't start becoming the Olsen we know until his second year here and truly blossomed starting year four.

Thanks for reminding me Cam had Shockey too.  Smith, Olsen and Shockey.  Yeah, that's close to the receiving core Young has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Once folks have made up their minds about something it's really hard for them to sway their opinion. I was wrong about Herbert. I was wrong about Josh Allen. It looks like I was probably wrong about Justin Fields. I was wrong about Micah Parsons. It happens. Everyone is wrong sometimes.

Agreed.  I felt the same way about Herbert and wasn't sure about Allen either.  But I've never had trouble eating crow when I'm wrong.   UT for many people, pride is the devil.

Everyone knows what my stance has been on Bryce, but I really want to be wrong about it for the sake of our success as a franchise.  And I won't have any trouble eating my crow if and when that time comes, and I hope it does.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...