Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What are your best ideas for trade packages to help this team?


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

Trade the rookie QB after two games but build around the dogshit LT who’s good for 20 penalty yards every game and single-handedly ruins drives. Oh and he can’t even touch speed rushers, let alone slow them down. 

“Good value” lol

The LT can play RT or OG and the QB is holding a clipboard but keep on pretending. Maybe if you hold your breath he will be what they sold you...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Waldo said:

The LT can play RT or OG and the QB is holding a clipboard but keep on pretending. Maybe if you hold your breath he will be what they sold you...

Maybe he’s holding a clipboard bc he’s injured. The LT can’t play LT. His biggest strength is killing drives, but maybe if you hold your breath he won’t false start every other drive. And he might even block somebody  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Carl Spackler said:

Maybe he’s holding a clipboard bc he’s injured. The LT can’t play LT. His biggest strength is killing drives, but maybe if you hold your breath he won’t false start every other drive. And he might even block somebody  

Lol why would I hold my breath on coaching when that is the problem with the Oline? They hired HC that wanted these changes and here we are. LT was looking good late last year. One of those has succeeded in the NFL and could again. Anyway you look at it the LT is still a better NFL player at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly I think the only viable trade chip is Burns. If you can get a 1st and another day 2 pick, I think you make the move, especially if this team is 0-6 in a few weeks. Personally, I think it's going to be pretty tough to pay all of Burns, Brown, Luvu and Chinn, and I honestly think I'd rather have Brown and Luvu. I just don't see how you can pay all of those defensive players and sign a legit potential WR #1.

This team is clearly at least a year away and maybe you can get more than a 1 and a 2 by trading Burns to a contender at the deadline who wants to go all-in or a team that has a surprise record and wants to capitalize (maybe Washington, they have a ton of cap space in 24). Just going to have to reload at edge rusher with whatever return we get from Burns. We desperately need to invest in the WR room given Thielen is only here likely for another year and then you're left with Mingo and nothing else.

Edited by UNCrules2187
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Realistically, I can see Chinn getting moved.  He's not a fit for this defense.  He's a great player when on the field, but he's just not getting the same amount of play time in this defense.  What could you get?  I have no clue.

I don't like the idea of trading Burns (based on passing last year), Brown (best player on that D), and no one else really looks like a viable asset to another team.

On offense - c'mon - there's no one of real value there.  Everyone has looks like poo, so their trade value is in the toilet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, UNCrules2187 said:

Honestly I think the only viable trade chip is Burns. If you can get a 1st and another day 2 pick, I think you make the move, especially if this team is 0-6 in a few weeks. Personally, I think it's going to be pretty tough to pay all of Burns, Brown, Luvu and Chinn, and I honestly think I'd rather have Brown and Luvu. I just don't see how you can pay all of those defensive players and sign a legit potential WR #1.

Sadly Chinn is at the point of being paid and still not an established starter at a given spot. That's not on him but coaching and team building. It stinks when you have to let a decently talented player walk because it's payday and they were mis-managed for 4 years. He looked good his rookie year, bad at FS and I don't think they ever let him play SS. Burns and Chinn are the most likely targets, no idea on what they could get for Chinn at this point and I don't know how they pay him moving forward unless he breaks in a good way this year. Brown completely depends on his contract negotiations, he will get paid but I don't know what he expects at this point. If it's decent he would be a good piece moving forward. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, d-dave said:

Realistically, I can see Chinn getting moved.  He's not a fit for this defense.  He's a great player when on the field, but he's just not getting the same amount of play time in this defense.  What could you get?  I have no clue.

I don't like the idea of trading Burns (based on passing last year), Brown (best player on that D), and no one else really looks like a viable asset to another team.

On offense - c'mon - there's no one of real value there.  Everyone has looks like poo, so their trade value is in the toilet.

Chinn is not getting anything more than a day 3 pick at this point. Probably a 5th given he's a FA at the end of the year and it's not like the Panthers think so highly of him that they're showcasing him on the field. I'd rather just hang on to him at this point and hope because of injuries they finally play him at ILB close to the line and rebuild his value to the point we get a comp pick if/when he signs elsewhere in FA.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
×
×
  • Create New...