Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

STHU about J. Stew, here and forevermore


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Jonathan Stewart is a men among men, and you had better start thinking of him like the beast that he is. So many of you have tried to insinuate that he couldn't carry the load, and that he is good back, while D. Will is a great one.

Well, I am here to tell you that Jonathan Stewart is a great back. He has shown it time and time again.

That second run against New Orleans was just pure speed, through and through.

Looked like Deangelo, plus a 6th gear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sell high, we should trade one if we can get a high 1st rounder. look, both are great backs, but we could use a top 10 pick to fill holes elsewhere and even missing d will, we have a good backup in sutton, and a good 3rd down back (atleast as a reciever) in goodson. same would be true if we moved stewie and not d will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sell high, we should trade one if we can get a high 1st rounder. look, both are great backs, but we could use a top 10 pick to fill holes elsewhere and even missing d will, we have a good backup in sutton, and a good 3rd down back (atleast as a reciever) in goodson. same would be true if we moved stewie and not d will.

No. No NO NO NO NO. Why trade the only thing that consistently works for our offense? RB's are a dime a dozen, their value is low and won't get anything valuable enough to warrant a trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. No NO NO NO NO. Why trade the only thing that consistently works for our offense? RB's are a dime a dozen, their value is low and won't get anything valuable enough to warrant a trade.

if you dont get top 10, dont trade. its that simple. you are making my point too; if you get a top 10 pick and rbs are a dime a dozen, why not take it? you would be getting the better end of the deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if Stewart could handle a full season of carries without someone like Dwill to take the pressure off. I still think he's injury prone.

I also still think DWill deserves the #1 spot and has shown that time and time again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if Stewart could handle a full season of carries without someone like Dwill to take the pressure off. I still think he's injury prone.

I also still think DWill deserves the #1 spot and has shown that time and time again.

Apparently, Stewart's Achilles started bothering him again this game in fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stewart is awesome, but he's got durability issues. He's battled nagging type injuries since he entered the league. Why shoot yourself in the foot for an unknown, when you know exactly what you get with Williams/Stewart. You get the best RB tandem in the league, hands down. You don't toss that out of the window.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stewart is awesome, but he's got durability issues. He's battled nagging type injuries since he entered the league. Why shoot yourself in the foot for an unknown, when you know exactly what you get with Williams/Stewart. You get the best RB tandem in the league, hands down. You don't toss that out of the window.

I concur. Keeping them fresh with taking turns is one of the important thing of keeping our rushing attacks fresh & winning games. Period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...