Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bally Sports Update


Anybodyhome
 Share

Recommended Posts

https://whatsondisneyplus.com/bally-sports-wants-to-strike-deals-with-hululive-tv-to-save-the-channel/

Earlier this year, the Diamond Sports Group, filed for bankruptcy, as it tried to restructure in order to provide coverage of 40 major sports teams in the US to cable customers.  Diamond owes money to both the National Basketball Association and National Hockey League, and is due to make a rights payment to them this week, and the existing distribution deal is up for renewal in the next few months.   It also has lots of deals with Major Baseball League teams, which due to the bankruptcy, has resulted in a new deal being made with MLB.TV since Diamond Sports couldn’t pay the teams as required.

Many of the major networks are adjusting their plans for sports broadcasting, as the cable linear system breaks down, the days of sports content being paid for by every viewer, regardless of whether they watched it or not, are coming to an end.  Customers want cheaper entertainment and more choices, so are less likely to want to pay for expensive packages they don’t want.

Diamond is asking for a longer rights deal than it currently has, which runs year to year, and to pay less for those rights.  According to a new report from the Wall Street Journal, Bally Sports is hoping to strike a new deal with YouTube TV and Hulu+Live TV to get the sports channels onto their live-streaming services.

Both YouTube TV and Hulu+Live TV have previously carried the Bally Sports RSN channels, but in 2020, stepped away, when Sinclair wanted over $300 million from these channels and was told they weren’t worth the cost.  Bally Sports wants to sign this new deal in order to get enough money together to secure the rights to the NHL and NBA.     The company is hoping it will be able to offer its own streaming service BallySports+ on YouTube TV and Hulu+Live TV for $19.99 a month to increase revenue.

Diamond Sports is also in negotiations with Comcast to extend their carriage deal, but also isn’t happy signing long-term contracts given the current legal situation.    However, it has recently been able to sign a year extension with DirecTV.   Should Bally Sports not pay the NBA teams on time, the NBA is already making plans to launch content directly through the NBA app and other networks.

Just this week, there has been a two-day mediation meeting between Diamond Sports, Sinclair, its creditors and representatives of the NBA, MLB and NHL, to come to an agreement on how to move forward.  After these meetings, no agreement was made and negotiations continue, but with over $8 billion of debt stemming from the purchase of the channels from Disney, it’s been trying to extend its bankruptcy deals to try to work its way out of the situation.   Some creditors are considering just winding down the company, while others are hoping they can renegotiate their deals to get them out of this situation.

And with other streaming services and broadcasters looking to acquire sports rights, things may get a little more tricky for Diamond Sports. With the bankruptcy still hanging over Diamond Sports, this makes it much more risky for both the clubs that sign deals to distribute their games and for networks to pay out for channels which might not even have the content they are paying for.

With Disney getting ready to launch its new full direct-to-consumer ESPN streaming platform in the next few years, and with its own ESPN channels and ESPN+ app, will Disney want to add Bally Sports onto Hulu+Live TV, plus will Disney want to spend more money out right now on sports rights that it hasn’t had for years, when it’s trying to reduce costs and complete the purchase of Comcast’s stake in Hulu?

Ultimately, we are seeing how the companies are trying to readjust to a change in consumer habits, but do you think Bally Sports will survive?

----------------------------------------------------------

But we can already get the Bally Sports South app for $19.99 per month, so what difference does it make if Hulu+Live adds it, while also charging $19.99 per month?

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

https://whatsondisneyplus.com/bally-sports-wants-to-strike-deals-with-hululive-tv-to-save-the-channel/

Earlier this year, the Diamond Sports Group, filed for bankruptcy, as it tried to restructure in order to provide coverage of 40 major sports teams in the US to cable customers.  Diamond owes money to both the National Basketball Association and National Hockey League, and is due to make a rights payment to them this week, and the existing distribution deal is up for renewal in the next few months.   It also has lots of deals with Major Baseball League teams, which due to the bankruptcy, has resulted in a new deal being made with MLB.TV since Diamond Sports couldn’t pay the teams as required.

Many of the major networks are adjusting their plans for sports broadcasting, as the cable linear system breaks down, the days of sports content being paid for by every viewer, regardless of whether they watched it or not, are coming to an end.  Customers want cheaper entertainment and more choices, so are less likely to want to pay for expensive packages they don’t want.

Diamond is asking for a longer rights deal than it currently has, which runs year to year, and to pay less for those rights.  According to a new report from the Wall Street Journal, Bally Sports is hoping to strike a new deal with YouTube TV and Hulu+Live TV to get the sports channels onto their live-streaming services.

Both YouTube TV and Hulu+Live TV have previously carried the Bally Sports RSN channels, but in 2020, stepped away, when Sinclair wanted over $300 million from these channels and was told they weren’t worth the cost.  Bally Sports wants to sign this new deal in order to get enough money together to secure the rights to the NHL and NBA.     The company is hoping it will be able to offer its own streaming service BallySports+ on YouTube TV and Hulu+Live TV for $19.99 a month to increase revenue.

Diamond Sports is also in negotiations with Comcast to extend their carriage deal, but also isn’t happy signing long-term contracts given the current legal situation.    However, it has recently been able to sign a year extension with DirecTV.   Should Bally Sports not pay the NBA teams on time, the NBA is already making plans to launch content directly through the NBA app and other networks.

Just this week, there has been a two-day mediation meeting between Diamond Sports, Sinclair, its creditors and representatives of the NBA, MLB and NHL, to come to an agreement on how to move forward.  After these meetings, no agreement was made and negotiations continue, but with over $8 billion of debt stemming from the purchase of the channels from Disney, it’s been trying to extend its bankruptcy deals to try to work its way out of the situation.   Some creditors are considering just winding down the company, while others are hoping they can renegotiate their deals to get them out of this situation.

And with other streaming services and broadcasters looking to acquire sports rights, things may get a little more tricky for Diamond Sports. With the bankruptcy still hanging over Diamond Sports, this makes it much more risky for both the clubs that sign deals to distribute their games and for networks to pay out for channels which might not even have the content they are paying for.

With Disney getting ready to launch its new full direct-to-consumer ESPN streaming platform in the next few years, and with its own ESPN channels and ESPN+ app, will Disney want to add Bally Sports onto Hulu+Live TV, plus will Disney want to spend more money out right now on sports rights that it hasn’t had for years, when it’s trying to reduce costs and complete the purchase of Comcast’s stake in Hulu?

Ultimately, we are seeing how the companies are trying to readjust to a change in consumer habits, but do you think Bally Sports will survive?

----------------------------------------------------------

But we can already get the Bally Sports South app for $19.99 per month, so what difference does it make if Hulu+Live adds it, while also charging $19.99 per month?

 

Doesn’t make much sense.  I assume just to get their branding on it and maybe increase how many people the option comes in front of. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Anybodyhome said:

The company is hoping it will be able to offer its own streaming service BallySports+ on YouTube TV and Hulu+Live TV for $19.99 a month to increase revenue

That's a pretty hefty price for a YouTube TV add-on. Good luck with that.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, djp14 said:

That's a pretty hefty price for a YouTube TV add-on. Good luck with that.

 

That's the same price as the Bally Sports stand-alone app. So what if it's attached to Hulu or YouTube? The price is the same. I don't understand how this is any better for the end-user.

Edited by Anybodyhome
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, USDepartmentOfSavagery said:

I plan on VPNing YouTubeTV in Europe so if they had Bally sports as an add on, it would be dope. 

 

1 hour ago, Anybodyhome said:

That's the same price as the Bally Sports stand-alone app. So what if it's attached to Hulu or YouTube? The price is the same. I don't understand how this is any better for the end-user.

Could be this. Get rid of the euro “pirate’s” that don’t have any way else to watch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Anybodyhome said:

That's the same price as the Bally Sports stand-alone app. So what if it's attached to Hulu or YouTube? The price is the same. I don't understand how this is any better for the end-user.

That's kinda my point.

If people were hesitant to pay $19.99/month for the stand alone app (and they were), they're not going to pay $19.99 for a YT add-on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The greed of the services since cord cutting went from what us poors did to have entertainment options without dishing out on premium cable packages is just astounding.

Sinclair really fuged us all over. That's the first and only takeaway for me in all this. Money grab by all parties since then.

League needs to step in and look out for fans. And since the league is all about bottom line ultimately, that ain't happening

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

all of the streaming services are operating in the red and only the companies like apple/prime can truly afford to sustain because of how much they have going on otherwise. sinclair thought they could get a monopoly on these local sports broadcasts but somehow thought people would pay 4x as much for apple plus to watch two local teams and that's it. i hope they continue to crash and burn. not a sustainable model and right now it's killing fans ability to see their teams

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...