Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce will need a special kind of O.C


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I've been disappointed by Bryce's arm talent. I thought his arm was probably NFL average at best but it's looking below average, possibly well below average. Some guys can make below average work but it requires straight up surgical accuracy and timing and we haven't seen that from Bryce yet.

Do you think better route running and timing is possible with the current staff and personnel?

None of us is ever gonna end up calling plays in the NFL, but I really think most of us on this forum could come up with one or two different plays that would work in a game situation if called at right time in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SCO96 said:

Do you think better route running and timing is possible with the current staff and personnel?

None of us is ever gonna end up calling plays in the NFL, but I really think most of us on this forum could come up with one or two different plays that would work in a game situation if called at right time in the game.

We did a better job today if scheming up receivers in the mid-range area than we have prior IMO. Bryce just isn't putting the ball in great locations when guys are NFL open. I really thought Bryce was the type of QB who would be throwing guys open with anticipation and elite ball placement. Right now he looks pretty average in those categories. If you're average in those categories you better have a cannon because you're gonna need it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Collinsworth just said what we’ve been discussing. Purdy knows he doesn’t have the strongest arm but he says he plays to his strengths by reading the defense and finding the open man. He is putting on a clinic tonight with his ball placement. This is why the Bryce situation is so depressing. We were led to believe that Bryce would be way more efficient with his throws.
 

This is a copycat league. If I were on the Panthers coaching staff I’d be taking as many plays/passing concepts from the 49er playbook that I could and incorporate into our passing game.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Thomas needs to call plays!! IBryce and Thielen got chemistry!! Mingo had a few good catches!! Sanders is not good.. he had a wide open gap and chose to run up into his own guys!! I was like WTF.. I think Bryce will be ok!! It’s a lot of poor execution from what I see!! Reich needs to give up the play calling!! If not.. he needs to be fired and promote Evero or Thomas

Edited by DamnItJake!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, SCO96 said:

Collinsworth just said what we’ve been discussing. Purdy knows he doesn’t have the strongest arm but he says he plays to his strengths by reading the defense and finding the open man. He is putting on a clinic tonight with his ball placement. This is why the Bryce situation is so depressing. We were led to believe that Bryce would be way more efficient with his throws.
 

This is a copycat league. If I were on the Panthers coaching staff I’d be taking as many plays/passing concepts from the 49er playbook that I could and incorporate into our passing game.

The problem is they have one of our key guys now!! Panthers don’t have the talent right now!! When a 30 y/o is your best WR u got issues.. Mingo had flashes today!! We just need more talent!! Purdy also has a little more zip than Bryce 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AggieLean said:

Should’ve just took Stroud.

No.  What we should have done is trade Burns last year for 2 first round picks and held our cards till 2024 when there was some real talent at quarterback coming up.  That is what should have been done but this is apparently a win now franchise now, that will never win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...