Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Deuce re-signing w/ Saints, Chase Daniel anyone??


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

from ProFootballTalk.com:

A league source tells us that veteran running back Deuce McAllister will be rejoining the Saints in time for Saturday's home playoff game against the Cardinals. The Saints could easily clear a roster spot by cutting quarterback Chase Daniel, who was signed two weeks ago for the regular-season finale, given that quarterback Drew Brees was given the day off. McAllister was released by the Saints in the offseason, and he has since signed with no one. He has a four-game suspension hanging over his head, given his membership in the StarCaps six.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/15/deuce-is-back-for-the-saints/

not sure why they are bringing him back though...

UPDATE: 1) its official 2) Daniel will be retained. they placed a DT on IR to make room.

Another Update: Deuce will not be playing, only leading the team on the field and will be inactive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would give Case Daniel a look, simply because the Saints seem somewhat interested. He is like a luxury to them who they'd like to have, but not at the expense of other more pressing needs. They're probably are willing to gamble that he will still be there, if and when they decide to throw him a bone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

from ProFootballTalk.com:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/15/deuce-is-back-for-the-saints/

not sure why they are bringing him back though...

Sirius NFL stated they thought it was for 2 reasons.....1 Duece has meant a lot to the city/organization and are just brining him on b/c they want to do something nice for him (even though he isn't needed) and 2. The dome reaction from fans when AZ comes to town. They said they had reports it was strictly a "symbolic" move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest DrewBreesIsGod

once he's introduced pre-game, you'll understand why. If all he does is stand on the bench and wave a towel, it'll be enough.

ddddeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm sure he'll be a good guy to have around when they are picking themselves off the floor because they just lost to the cards.

he's known plenty of disappointment being a saints player for so long so he'll be able to help them through it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest DrewBreesIsGod

i'm sure he'll be a good guy to have around when they are picking themselves off the floor because they just lost to the cards.

he's known plenty of disappointment being a saints player for so long so he'll be able to help them through it.

yep, he's got as many super bowl rings as the Panthers do!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...