Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Seriously, do y'all want a positive vibes only thread?


LinvilleGorge
 Share

Do y'all want a positive vibes only thread?  

69 members have voted

  1. 1. Do y'all want a positive vibes only thread?

    • Yes
      34
    • No
      35


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, WUnderhill said:

Weren’t people getting banned for reviving dead threads?

That was for bumping months old threads, usually folks bragging about how they wanted Stroud. The board was being overrun with Stroud threads.

I just wanted to remind y'all to be what you claimed to want. You wanted the poo posting to calm down. Hell, it largely has. But lke I said, at the first chance y'all had you'd become the new very loud poo posters.

And here we are. The prophecy hath been foretold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

That was for bumping months old threads, usually folks bragging about how they wanted Stroud. The board was being overrun with Stroud threads.

I just wanted to remind y'all to be what you claimed to want. You wanted the poo posting to calm down. Hell, it largely has. But lke I said, at the first chance y'all had you'd become the new very loud poo posters.

And here we are. The prophecy hath been foretold.

Maybe there should be a negative vibes only thread or something like that. Just so people can poo on Bryce Young in peace after a win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

Maybe there should be a negative vibes only thread or something like that. Just so people can poo on Bryce Young in peace after a win.

Anyone talking trash about Bryce's performance in this game is an idiot. He had no protection, several drops from his WRs, and next to no running game. We also had an empty red zone trip and he still managed a GW drive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

Anyone talking trash about Bryce's performance in this game is an idiot. He had no protection, several drops from his WRs, and next to no running game. We also had an empty red zone trip and he still managed a GW drive. 

It’s all very thinly veiled “We won today because of defense” From the same posters who blame Bryce for losses when the defense gives up 40. That, and “Well we won but I still have questions about arm strength/size/QB sneaks” the same tired bs. Or in Linville’s case “Wow it is so pathetic seeing people here happy after a win, how dare they call out people who trashed Bryce and said Stroud should have been the pick.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is simply a team that is unable to beat the teams they should beat. If they do that, no convoluted tiebreaker needed, and a justifiable winning record.  Team was 8-10 on the year and showed progress. But let’s not get carried away and throw a parade because of some fluke tiebreaker result.  We finished 1-3 coming out of a bye and 3 of those were ‘must win’ games. Only Seattle was not a must win. So we finished 1-2 in must win games and backed into the playoffs due to a fluke.  Generally speaking most teams drop a couple they shouldn’t and win a couple they shouldn’t. And that is what happened with our 2 wins over playoff teams. We stole a couple.    it was good that we did that, but a true good team does not get swept by the Saints, with a QB making only his second start in that first game.     That is what losing teams do. I have seen enough losing teams to know that.    Aside from that, I understand the thought that we have arrived and now we should expect to win every week. But I don’t really agree that we are there yet. I understand the FO and coaching staff need to take that posture around the players, but I am worried if they really believe that and start making moves based off of thinking our window is open NOW. .   I think one more season of acting as if we are building and the window is yet to open, would serve us better.  You know, afraid we are gonna start doing ‘win now’ moves and undermine the build.    We are really set up to take a step back now, with this harder schedule, with the unexpected Icky injury, and still with a lot of holes.     
    • Unless it’s cheap. He is only 2 years from 100 point season and plays 200 feet. 
    • I mean, if you could tell before he ever took a snap... ammiright?  Reality, my friend, shows a massive history of the best QBs taking time to come up to speed. Those that didn't are very, very rare. Manning, Rogers, Manning, Young, Montana, Stabler, Bradshaw, Staubach, Favre ... the list of those that took a few years to either get off the bench or make it on the field just goes on and on. The list of those thrown into the fire and just getting burned up is even longer. There's no magic crystal ball. There's just good coaching, patience and a helluva lot of luck in these picks.  
×
×
  • Create New...