Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nobody wants to work with Cutler


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

Its bad when someone takes the raiders OC job over the bears.

The perception is that no one wants to come work for Smith, who is in a win-or-else situation, but rumblings at the Senior Bowl are that some candidates could be turned off by quarterback Jay Cutler and don’t want to hitch their wagon to him. Still, few quarterbacks possess the skills of Cutler. Today marks Day 21 of the coaching search.

http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Biggs-Bears-move-to-Plan-E-for-coordinator.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At some point, you have to wonder if perhaps its not the Quarterback thats the problem with the Chicago passing game. Every Bears QB has looked bad over the last few years, but Orton looked better in Denver, while Cutler looked worse. Not that I know what the problem is.

I have been saying the same thing. Moose went there and looked average at best came back here and looked like he hadn't missed a beat. My thinking is there is some deep seeded offensive decision making/coaching problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been saying the same thing. Moose went there and looked average at best came back here and looked like he hadn't missed a beat. My thinking is there is some deep seeded offensive decision making/coaching problem.

It is pretty hard to pass consistently in Chicago due to the winds if I am not mistaken.

Unless that is an urban myth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Might be something to that. The last Hall of Fame QB the Bears had was Sid Luckman, during the WWII era.

Chicago should have invested in a dome stadium instead of Jay Cutler.

But that doesn't make much sense seeing as the Bears tend to suck through the air regardless of where they play. I think its coaching myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Gustavsson would be insane. I think we would have to break the bank to afford that move. Which, I don't think is necessarily a bad idea. Ultimately, Freddie isn't likely to be around more than a couple of seasons more. We can all agree that unless they have a fleet of sports psychologists working on Kochetkov, he will never be capable of getting his head on straight enough to compete.
    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
×
×
  • Create New...