Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We prob made the wrong pick BUT


Frank9999
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Brees was also taller with a better arm. 
Bryce struggles to throw accurately at 20 yards. 
Never liked or agreed with the Brees comparison. 
I feel Bryce‘s ceiling is Bridgewater.

If Bryce's ceiling is Teddy, then we definitely fuged up royally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PappyMay said:

I'm hoping yeah they may of drafted Burrow, but we drafted Tua. It could be worse. I'm no longer mad at the pick, just what we had to give up to go get him which isnt on him.

Yea its a haul for a project qb. I think its fair to say its already disappointing based on he isnt a immediate difference maker 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

3 minutes ago, top dawg said:

If Bryce's ceiling is Teddy, then we definitely fuged up royally.

I dont think thats fair to compare him to Teddy yet. Bryce arm keeps being sold low not sure why its not as bad as people are saying

Edited by Frank9999
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Frank9999 said:

 

I dont think thats fair to compare him to Teddy yet. Bryce arm keeps being sold low not sure why its not as bad as people are saying

Through 8 games you’d think I would see something that made me excited about his throwing ability. But almost all I have seen is meh. Nothing exciting. Nothing that says yeah this guy was worth all the capital we spent on him. This guy was worth taking 1st overall. 
All I see is a struggling, mediocre at best QB. Regardless of being a rookie even Lawrence, people seem to love bringing him up, had some good highlights by the 8 game mark in spite of Urban Meyer being an idiot. 
I have said it before, you don’t trade up for a QB and take him first overall if you need a perfect team around him. If you do then the team made a big mistake. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

You know, I have said in the past that I believed in acquiring quality vets for the O-line as opposed to drafting them. Nothing in the past 5-10 years has really changed my mind.

I wouldn’t be opposed to that type of policy.

NCAA has done a poo job training OL forthe pro game the last however many years.

Drafting Tackles especially has become a guessing game of projections and extrapolation. 

 

Edit: I understand it is not the NCAA’s job to train people for an NFL career, but effectively, that is what it is. 

Edited by stratocatter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just chasing targets is a fools game. Chase averaged 85 yrds and .76 TDs per game his first year and 87.16 yrds, and .75 TD's per game his second year. Statistically the same. NOT an improvement. Puka saw no increase either. Yes, Waddle's went down because he had to share targets with another receiver - just like TMac will have to share targets with Coker next year so you have actually just made my point concerning Coker. Olave saw an increase in targets but Carr replaced Dalton and even with the increase in targets, his production was pretty flat (83 extra yards and 1 more TD for the entire year). And Wilson's number did increase but the Jets replaced the other two receivers and their contribution was significantly down from Davis's and Moore's. Again, nothing in those numbers should lead anyone to believe there will be a big leap for Tmac next year.       
    • See my previous post. You're also leaving out that T-Mac was likely hitting a rookie wall, like 95% of rookies do late in their first season, combined with the added attention on him by defenses, which in turn would be why Bryce looked Coker's way down the stretch.  With Coker playing like that to start next year, defenses will have to pay attention to it, which will then also make things easier for T-Mac. All of which is also ignoring that T-Mac will just be a better player next year than he was this year, assuming he works on his game this offseason, which we all know he will be.  If a player who was already your clear cut #1 comes back even better his next season, you're going to make sure you're throwing it his way more often, no matter who else you have. Again, Coker's added targets won't be at the expense of T-Mac's, they will BOTH be taking targets from the rest of the team.  Not to mention, we should be passing it more next year to begin with, seeing as we'll have both of them hopefully ready to go full speed Week 1, which again, will help both their target totals increase. Coker looks like a really good player, but even the most optimistic person can't say he looks like he has #1 potential, he has very solid to maybe even high end #2 potential.  You're not taking targets away from the reigning OROY who looks like a true Top 15 WR already to get your #2 targets, you increase both of them by taking from the others.
    • Need to crush the hawks tonight. A lose would really damage momentum 
×
×
  • Create New...