Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jets waive Michael Carter


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I largely agree, but you have to look for every opportunity to improve your roster. If a guy is available for practically nothing who is better than the worst guy currently on your roster at that position then you shouldn't neglect to make that move simply because it doesn't address your biggest roster issues. You have to get better where you can when you can taking advantage of current opportunities. I mean, it'd be awesome if Trent Williams or Tyreek Hill suddenly became available but that's not reality.

I can't argue that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, top dawg said:

I can't say that with surety. I know the line is a huge problem, but even with that, I'm thinking Carter would be an upgrade for next season if nothing else.

 

11 hours ago, top dawg said:

I can't say that with surety. I know the line is a huge problem, but even with that, I'm thinking Carter would be an upgrade for next season if nothing else.

 

11 hours ago, top dawg said:

I can't say that with surety. I know the line is a huge problem, but even with that, I'm thinking Carter would be an upgrade for next season if nothing else.

One thing is for certain, we have to do something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He's a JAG who can really catch the ball and run after the catch. That fits what we're trying to do on offense better than anyone we currently have.

Lol. I mean he wouldn't have had any discernable impact even if he did see the field. That isn't a player that is going to move the needle at all. 

This offense is what it is. Dumpster diving isn't gonna do anything.

Edited by kungfoodude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Lol. I mean he wouldn't have had any discernable impact even if he did see the field. That isn't a player that is going to move the needle at all. 

This offense is what it is. Dumpster diving isn't gonna do anything.

It's not about this year. It's about trying to build a better roster moving forward. I was hoping he'd end up in Washington honestly. He fits them to a tee. Damn Arizona.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I said that way back because it is true. Teams aren’t trading what appears to be a can’t miss prospect.    In an extremely rare scenario like they have an established QB and maybe got the pick in a trade. Sort of like the Bears but with a better incumbent. If they’d have had someone significantly better than Fields they might have cashed in. 
    • So you're saying you'd still go back and take the inferior talents, just because you think they fit with Bryce better, a player who is more likely than not, to no longer be a Panther next year? That's just crazy to say, wanting to have a worse player because you think they fit better with your awful QB is just dumb.  You take the best players, if your existing players then aren't good enough, you replace them later. It's crazy that there are still people with this take after they've seen what T-Mac can do for us in just 5 games so far.
    • I have seen Bryce make some outstanding throws but what he is up against is even when the WRs get a little separation, that tightens up while the ball is in the air. By degrees depending on the distance. Not as critical on the short stuff. 
×
×
  • Create New...