Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

4th-and-6 bubble screen


Dorian Gray
 Share

Recommended Posts

He is useless which is no surprise fitterer and tepper the guys who picked him are worthless too. I honestly feel bad for frank. We're forced in to running a certain scheme for an extremely undersized qb with olineman that can't run the scheme either.  So linemen can't run it , coach can't coach it and wrs don't fit it either.  Genius just genius.  I'm gonna go watch the Texans. They've got my qb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, HardcoreHokie said:

He definitely changed *something* but good Lord that was one of the most ferocious blitzes I’ve ever seen.  

Would love for someone to post a replay of that one.  Defenders were in there *immediately*. 

Slants are wonderful pressure beaters.  If it's a jailhouse break you don't even have to really worry about getting past the sticks because the void immediately behind the DL.  Probably have at most one man to beat.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, pantherj said:

He was screaming KILL KILL KILL so obviously he audibled.

Doesn't necessarily mean he audibled

Probably a better chance that 2 plays were called in the huddle and he just killed it to the second play, which may have been the right call based on the look the defense gave.

The problem is if that second play that was called was that screen.

It may be semantics, but there is a significant difference, if that was a second play called in the huddle, I wouldn't call that an audible as I'm sure there were specific things he was supposed to look for and then check to that play if he did/didn't see them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, toldozer said:

No Steve was able to work to his lines strength not forced to work to their weakness

You can act like Wilkes could have magically had PS guards playing great but I choose to be realistic.. sorry.. He had the same bad situation in Zona .. What happened??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, recceice said:

You can act like Wilkes could have magically had PS guards playing great but I choose to be realistic.. sorry.. He had the same bad situation in Zona .. What happened??

He'd be no better running this offense were forced to Run. Bryce is the problem more than anyone else

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...