Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 Mock Drafts

pantherj

By pantherj,
in 2023 NFL Draft

 Share

Recommended Posts

ECHornet Grand Master

ECHornet

Posted
Posted

I try to limit to one trade per draft since the trade back options on PFN mocks can get unrealistic quick. 
 

Worthy- this offense desperately needs a deep threat and someone who can make something out of nothing. Worthy can do both.

COMP: Devonta Smith

Braelon Allen- we have a need for a short yardage/goal line back. 

COMP: James Conner (less tenacious)

James Williams- a dawg Morgan is looking for. This guy will deliver big hits as a rookie. Shaq replacement?
COMP: Kam Chancellor (game has changed where Kam types are playing LB now)

Beaux Limmer- know little about him. Took best graded OL available.

Joe Milton- Similar to Braelon Allen, this is an attempt to beef up our short yardage game. We will need to grind out games relying on our defense until we acquire the weapons needed at skill positions. Milton would be trained to execute the Philly QB sneak and build a goal line/short yardage package for him. Never know what he might become down the road.

Quinton Newsome- know little about him. Took best graded CB available.

 


IMG_2192.thumb.jpeg.5f4a23501b5ba04fe6b448c858aec2e5.jpeg

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SOJA Mentor

SOJA

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, rayzor said:

we should do this.

image.png.c87e9afed0b390188f1275f1adebc0e5.png

ladd and xavier in back to back picks would be a home fuging run. It's like the only realistic scenario I'm happy with WR at both 33 and 65

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, SOJA said:

ladd and xavier in back to back picks would be a home fuging run. It's like the only realistic scenario I'm happy with WR at both 33 and 65

there's a few more i'd be good with myself, but what im hoping we do is get two good complimentary WRs. Adding in a big TE, two RBs with some power and fight and then another utility guy that can be a return specialist...i know we've got a lot of needs all over the place, but i just don't know when we'll see such a good group of playmakers again. i'll be disappointed if we don't come away with at least 3 offensive playmakers. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

some combo of back to back WRs to start like Mitchell and then Leggette would be my ideal draft.  I then would go BPA of offensive positions after that.  TE, RB, OL.  

I want all offense.  That IMO should be the priority.  Infusing this team with offensive talent.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted
On 3/8/2024 at 9:30 AM, CRA said:

some combo of back to back WRs to start like Mitchell and then Leggette would be my ideal draft.  I then would go BPA of offensive positions after that.  TE, RB, OL.  

I want all offense.  That IMO should be the priority.  Infusing this team with offensive talent.   

Part of me would feel guilty for not getting Evero anyone for the D, but we are in desperate need of help in offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hoenheim Veteran

Hoenheim

Posted
Posted (edited)

Another Sunday, another mock draft. I see a lot of you going WR early so I tried something different.  I'm a little sick of constantly striking out on WRs we draft in R2. 

 

 

 

Screenshot_20240310_130756_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20240310_130818_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20240310_130829_Chrome.jpg

Edited by Hoenheim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • CamWhoaaCam
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

      Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • CamWhoaaCam
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

      Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...