Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bobcats talking to Celtics about Augustin for Davis...


CatMan72

Recommended Posts

Flip as the backup point scares the bejueezus out of me.

DJ right now is a liabilty. He can't guard anybody and he has a hard time getting the team into their sets. If he is not hitting his jumper he is a waste on the floor. I rather have Law or Flip atleast they play defence.

I still think we can get sombody better then Big baby. I don't know how good a rebounder he is and does he have any post game. He does hit a 15 foot jumper some time so that might be a plus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Augustin needs badly away from Larry Brown and Big Baby needs badly away from Kevin Garnett and the rest of the Celtics room that thinks he's a lazy POS. I wouldn't see the harm in making this move as long as Law became the back up point as opposed to Flip. If anybody could get production out of Big Baby, it's LB. Not the case with Augustin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This particular rumor has been popular for a couple of days now, but Gary Washburn of the Boston Globe is saying that it's probably not going to happen, no matter what Jared Dudley might be tweeting.

According to his sources, any talk about a swap of Augustin and Davis is in the preliminary stages, and Celtics GM Danny Ainge has even gone so far as to say that he's content with this backcourt depth at the moment. So while this rumor had some legs over at ESPN on Tuesday, by Thursday it's been pretty much buried.

darn, Davis woulda been a nice addition

the search for a PF continues...........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He can’t even learn to run routes. No chance in hell he can do both that and pick up blocking schemes 
    • Well he had essentially a 70% completion rate for almost three thousand yards.  Biggest issues were awkward and inconsistent release.  I wouldn't call arm strength bad, but not great.    
    • I see him being better and most of that is a few downfield passes that were seemingly non existent.    But it is what is around him that has dictated the trajectory more than the quarterbacking. He is game manager level and unable to dictate to defenses.  And even if I am wrong and he is the reason we ‘upwarded’, we are bumping our heads on the ceiling and only making meager gains. If it is an incline it is awfully shallow degree wise. Like a finance graph that tracks your progress and hovers around the rate of inflation. Barely breaking even.  Is that where you want your money?  We make up these deadlines expectations and generally he does the minimum of what he needs to do to hang around.    It does not encourage me to believe that when we get into a game against a good run d that we cannot break down with our run game, to believe that we can pivot to the air and successfully counter their strategy.  But they run it back again. Of course I am gunshy of a repeat of the same thing we have watched for three years.    oh, and yes his durability is his most impressive positive for my money. I fear the other shoe dropping on that and the contractual consequences that will follow.   Last  of all, too late to edit my mistake here but would like to acknowledge it: the last three years has done very little to convince me that I was not wrong in not wanting him. One too many “not”s. 
×
×
  • Create New...