Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Non-Panthers NFL Games


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Sorry but his stats are too damn good to say he's the luckiest QB in the league. He plays a big part in their success. He throws a great pass.

Miles Sanders was the NFL's 5th leading rusher last year. System and situation can play a huge role. It's playing a huge role for Purdy. The folks who think Bryce would be doing the same in SF are coping but Purdy in Carolina would not have anyone talking about Purdy as a franchise QB.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Sorry but his stats are too damn good to say he's the luckiest QB in the league. He plays a big part in their success. He throws a great pass.

Is there a better RB/WR/WR/TE foursome in the league around a QB?   Probably best LT in the NFL taking care of him.  Then you got one of the best play callers in the NFL as the maestro.  

Purdy doesn’t suck.  But almost any competent NFL QB that can play the full field is going to look like a Pro Bowler in SF right now IMO

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Miles Sanders was the NFL's 5th leading rusher last year. System and situation can play a huge role. It's playing a huge role for Purdy. The folks who think Bryce would be doing the same in SF are coping but Purdy in Carolina would not have anyone talking about Purdy as a franchise QB.

 

And the Eagles were fading him out down the stretch last year because he wasn’t actually a good RB.  That OL was getting him rushing yards and he was really bad last year in a lot of aspects that don’t show up on the stat sheet.  Which was my #1 off season rant. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...