Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

First team in NFL history….


Tbe
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, bigjohn said:

EVERYONE had Bryce at #1 or #2.

And that was before the s2 test (although that may well have sealed the deal at #1).

Oh im sure everyone was dying to eliminate over half of an NFL playbook to accommodate the weakest arm in all of the league.

Show me these teams big board that had Bryce on it. You are going off media speculation.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tbe said:

Not only did the Panthers become the first team in NFL history to go a full season without a fourth-quarter lead…

 

I heard this today too, but please explain it.  They had two wins and neither were in overtime…so they led and won both in the 4th, right? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

Oh im sure everyone was dying to eliminate over half of an NFL playbook to accommodate the weakest arm in all of the league.

Show me these teams big board that had Bryce on it. You are going off media speculation.  

Show me any reputable sources that had him being undrafted, which is basically what the folks here bashing Bryce are saying—that he doesn’t being on a roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, HardcoreHokie said:

I heard this today too, but please explain it.  They had two wins and neither were in overtime…so they led and won both in the 4th, right? 

They took the lead in both with a FG as time expired. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

Oh im sure everyone was dying to eliminate over half of an NFL playbook to accommodate the weakest arm in all of the league.

Show me these teams big board that had Bryce on it. You are going off media speculation.  

Houston would have taken him 1. John McClain the Houston insider even vouched. The Bryce slander is getting stupid. He had a crap year but to state he should have been undrafted is just stupid.

Edited by Panthercougar68
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

They took the lead in both with a FG as time expired. 

Gotcha, that technically makes sense I guess.  But the two walk-off field goals were in the 4th quarter so I’d still disagree with the fact (if it made any difference lol).  
We set a lotta records this year, that’s all that really matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Houston would have taken him 1. John McClain the Houston insider even vouched. The Bryce slander is getting stupid. He had a crap year but to state he should have been undrafted is just stupid.

I never said undrafted, but he was not some slam dunk #1 overall pick. To me he should have been at best the #3 QB based on upside alone. 

We should have been choosing between Stroud and Richardson, not boy wonder at #1 overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, HardcoreHokie said:

Gotcha, that technically makes sense I guess.  But the two walk-off field goals were in the 4th quarter so I’d still disagree with the fact (if it made any difference lol).  
We set a lotta records this year, that’s all that really matters.

They never ran a play with a lead - they were behind when they kicked and then the game ended. That's the (dubious) record, that they ran zero plays in the 4th quarter while having a lead. There is no 'technically' about it.

Edited by KSpan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, KSpan said:

They never ran a play with a lead - they were behind when they kicked and then the game ended. That's the (dubious) record, that they ran zero plays in the 4th quarter while having a lead. There is no 'technically' about it.

It’s a meaningless stat, so nobody cares.  But “technically” the way it’s being worded is inacurate.

“Panthers become the first team in NFL history to go a full season without a fourth-quarter lead…”

They led and won 2 games in the 4th quarter (with 0 seconds left).  They didn’t run a play with the lead, that is also correct.  

I guess we’re famous for something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bigjohn said:

Show me any reputable sources that had him being undrafted, which is basically what the folks here bashing Bryce are saying—that he doesn’t being on a roster.

Everyone got it wrong. He was qb #3 for me but if the league did a redraft right now he wouldn't be in the top 5 and I'm not even joking when I say he might not go to the 5th or 6th round.

 

He's better than Clayton Tune I'll give you that. 

Edited by toldozer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Shotgun said:

Yeah if Kyler is 5'10" then Young 5'8"

The Riot Report on X: "Here's Bryce Young next to Kyler Murray. Murray,  measured at 5'10", is wearing taller shoes and is slightly ahead of Young.  (From Oct. 2022) https://t.co/CdRWjjklnR" / X

Everyone talks about height, but look how much more built Kyler is.  Jalen Hurts squats 600 pounds and is short.  Russell Wilson is short but pretty jacked.

Bryce needs to HIT THE WEIGHTROOM HARD this off-season.  Can’t fix height but you can build muscle mass.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
×
×
  • Create New...