Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

You know who is eyeing that peppers money?


Zod

Recommended Posts

It's better to spread the money around to a group of excellent players than to put it all into the hands of one phenomenal, yet spotty, player who'd rather not be here.

I hate to see Pep go, but it was both his wish and for the betterment of the team long-term. Maybe we'll play against him in the Super Bowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but is it enough to extend dwill, beason, and davis... and maybe stewart?

Yep. At least the The 21 million the tag surely could.

Let's see the Panthers get 3 great , significantly younger players and one soon to be great young player...maybe with a little change to spare.

for

1 great player...at 50%.

Anyone who says we should have tagged Peppers is a fuging complete idiot. He didn't want to play here. No one would have paid that and no matter how great a player thinking logically, getting rid of him will help this team as a whole far more than keeping him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah in the last thread where everyone was panicking i asked if they'd rather have peppers or a locked up beason, davis, kalil, marshall, and deangelo.

no one really said anything and just continued to eat paste

Besides money I like the way these guys you listed play football. The Panthers need the passion these guys bring and now that it will be their team they need to set the bar very high how each guy on the 53 man roster is expected to perform. Every game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be surprised if we do anything with Beason and Williams and might only tender Davis and Marshall. That way you save money in 2011 if there is a lockout. Seems Richardson is all about saving money.

Personally I think we should take the opportunity to extend some guys and give them a front loaded contract because there are no cap implications this year. That way when the cap is put back in place, we will take a much smaller hit rather than the other way around with backloaded contracts.

But then again it isn't my money so what do I know?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be surprised if we do anything with Beason and Williams and might only tender Davis and Marshall. That way you save money in 2011 if there is a lockout. Seems Richardson is all about saving money.

Personally I think we should take the opportunity to extend some guys and give them a front loaded contract because there are no cap implications this year. That way when the cap is put back in place, we will take a much smaller hit rather than the other way around with backloaded contracts.

But then again it isn't my money so what do I know?

Why does everyone keep saying that JR is "all about saving money"?

They made one decision that Peppers was not worth $20M for one season or the probably ridculous amount he wanted for a long-term deal.

We may not play heavyin the big name FA signings. But, that is prob a good thing. This FA Class sucks and is very weak. When that happens, you overpay for mediocre players ....just becuase they are the best ones available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • His footwork has been discussed at length, just like Cam's was--no argument from me there. What I'm asking for is a statistical indicator that supports the idea that Bryce's footwork is creating meaningful issues. With Cam, we could clearly correlate occasional high passes to footwork problems. With Bryce, there are occasional misfires as well, but we aren't seeing it surface with the frequency of severity you'd expect if it were such a persistent issue. That's why when concerns about his footwork and height are paired together, there should be some measurable statistical impact. That's what I keep coming back to. That same inconsistency shows up in the deep ball critique. Saying "he misses guys outright" suggests he either isn't seeing them or can't hit them downfield... yet, as we've already seen, he was top-10 in catchable passes over 20+ yards. If accuracy were truly the issue, it should reflect in the data. It's also worth pointing out that deep-ball concerns largely became the next talking point after he made it through the season without the durability disaster some were predicting (despite being sacked for what was then the second-most times ever for a rookie QB). As for those sideline throws you mentioned: what specific throws are you referring to? If you can identify them, I'd be happy to pull up the PFF premium grades or grab All-22 clips from NFL Pro to look at those sequences and assess how real that concern is. For my part, I'd actually like to see improvement in the intermediate game. That was a strength his rookie year, but he seemed to trade it for a stronger deep game this past season. Could that shift relate to height and footwork? Maybe! But again... we'd need data or film trends to verify that rather than assume it. On the "top-10" classification front: I know that it's a moving target for most people. That's why I've been asking for specifics. Without a shared definition, it's hard to engage meaningfully. So with you moving away from raw yardage, does that mean your preferred KPIs are now height, weight, red zone efficiency, and point differential? If so, that's totally fine (just being clear about it helps). That said... red zone success and point differential depend heavily on OL play, WR execution, coaching decisions, defense (for point differential), etc. They're influenced by the QB but not exclusively determined by him... which, like passing yards, makes them more difficult to isolate for analysis of Bryce's performance.
    • I think "amazing" is basically relating to his prior performances, which is a very low bar. Even at his peak(so far), he hasn't consistently been an elite performer either by the simple eye test nor statistically. Regardless, we have seen the flashes of WHY we drafted him #1 overall and he is visibility significantly more confident. Hopefully he has spent an inordinate amount of time this offseason getting that footwork better and more consistent. That's going to be a massive factor in his continuing improvement.
×
×
  • Create New...