Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

March 9th Kemo bonus


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

we won't have to re-sign him. he'll be under contract for 2010 regardless. the option is if we decide to continue our relationship with him beyond that.

3/11/2006: Signed a five-year, $23 million contract. The deal includes $8 million guaranteed. If Kemoeatu's 2010 option bonus is not exercised, his contract will expire after the 2010 season.

2009: $2 million (+ $1.9 million in guaranteed bonuses),

2010: $750,000 (+ $9.3 million option bonus due in March),

2011: $1.485 million (Voidable Years),

2012: $2.115 million,

2013: $2.745 million,

2014: $3.375 million,

2015: Free Agent

linkif we don't exercise the option then we are on the hook for $750k one way or the other. might as well keep him around and see if he recovers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has a $9.3 million option bonus due in early March which would extend his contract through 2014, but no one anticipated that ever being picked up. It was written into his deal last offseason to save some salary cap room. When that tab isn’t picked up (according to contract documents obtained by The Herald), he’ll be due a $1.7 million non-exercise bonus and a base salary of $2.6 million for next season, essentially what he’d have made before...

Link

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I think depending on how good a push he can get from that injury he has. That will tell us wheather he will stay are not. It all comes down to how much push up from he can get on the sleds in mini camp and all. I hope he has healed fine to where he can come back and play again this coming year. But it is a concern at this point to wheather are not that injury is going to heal properly to allow him to keep doing his job up front on sundays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we won't have to re-sign him. he'll be under contract for 2010 regardless. the option is if we decide to continue our relationship with him beyond that.

linkif we don't exercise the option then we are on the hook for $750k one way or the other. might as well keep him around and see if he recovers.

I know that.But he has a roster bonus due march 9th for 1.7mill.I am saying if we cut him so he wont get that.do you think we will re-sign him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that.But he has a roster bonus due march 9th for 1.7mill.I am saying if we cut him so he wont get that.do you think we will re-sign him

Are you asking if he is resigned (as in, next year) will they have to pay that bonus?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that.But he has a roster bonus due march 9th for 1.7mill.I am saying if we cut him so he wont get that.do you think we will re-sign him

I think he gets cut before he's owed the roster bonus if he hasn't made some serious improvement with his recovery from the injury. If the do cut him, I doubt they would sign him back after that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any chance of a trade?

Most of the tagged guys ended up being DT's especially from 3-4 defenses.

Not many left out there in the FA pool.

I think if Kemo was not coming off injury then a low pick.But no team going to give us anything for him now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that.But he has a roster bonus due march 9th for 1.7mill.I am saying if we cut him so he wont get that.do you think we will re-sign him
i'd be surprised if we could re-sign him. there are a lot of teams that want/need a big NT. as bad as we think he might be, he's still going to be attractive to someone. he isn't some scrub. he's a big body that can clog up the middle. that makes life easier for a lot of other players. he'll be an attractive option for quite a few teams.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
    • In 6 games, we've only had 6 hurries??? ... that can't be accurate
×
×
  • Create New...