Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offseason program begins


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

His year 1 was the biggest cluster fug of a team offensively anyone has ever seen. When multiple talking heads say he wasn’t even a chance it might be wise to take their word and wait and see. Frank Reich and his staff was literally work than the Texans David Culley staff.

He was literally scared to throw the ball to open guys multiples times through the season. He had lots of chances where he just threw the ball out of bounds. That happened in real life. Those choices change the trajectory of a game and determines how a defense plays against a qb. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

But we also beat the Texans when Frank wasn’t calling plays

just saying.

Didn't we proceed to play some of our worst football of the season following that game including one where our top pick threw two gut wrenching pick sixes to the same defender?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jackie Lee said:

He was literally scared to throw the ball to open guys multiples times through the season. He had lots of chances where he just threw the ball out of bounds. That happened in real life. Those choices change the trajectory of a game and determines how a defense plays against a qb. 

Welcome to rookie qb play lol 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Is that Bryce or the system? Did better when Reich was gone. You can have fun with rookie numbers when they play more than 8 games like a lot of rookie QBs.

We literally scored 0 points in the last two games how is that better than earlier in the season?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, *FreeFua* said:

adding some muscle would help generate some more torque which would help with arm strength 

You’d think you wouldn’t have to explain that to a sports fan but it’s 2024 and nothing is surprising anymore smh 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

Didn't we proceed to play some of our worst football of the season following that game including one where our top pick threw two gut wrenching pick sixes to the same defender?

What are you talking about? 2023 was all awful football because the offensive staff didn’t know how to operate.

It wasn’t a conscience that we beat the Texans but the fact that “Frank took back over” showed there was more going on than you realized.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, csx said:

the sweeping anlaysis being made from 2 second twitter clip is funny poo

You think it's funny but the rest of us remember folks like you looking down on others telling people it's only preseason last year.

Keep thinking you're so above it all though.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nobody is saying we don't need it, just that we have bigger needs elsewhere, and that type of WR is actually something that is often found in the mid rounds, you just have to scout and evaluate properly. Here's another way of looking at why WR in the 1st shouldn't even be considered an option. Looking only at players currently on the team, what position group would you feel strongest about 4 years from now? I'm not sure there is a better answer there than WR, as you have to think T-Mac is our best player on the team in 4 years, with Coker not far behind. Our OL is too old to be considered, my opinions on Bryce is well known, Hubbard will be done by then and the rest of the RB is an unknown, Off-ball LB is maybe our biggest need, we only have 1 legit safety, it's certainly not TE, and our 2nd best CB right now will be 33 by then.   Brown should still be a beast as he'll only be 31, but nobody else on the DL projects to be that good in 4 years.  Edge rusher with Phillips, Scourton, and Princely is probably the only other possible answer than WR. So yes, that fast/shifty type of WR is 100% a need of ours, but we have so many other bigger needs both in the immediate and future, that to me, taking a WR in the 1st for the 3rd year in a row and having hit on another WR in the same time frame, just makes zero sense both currently and looking into the future.
    • Laughing at Slayton (Mooney or Calvin Austin III), but telling me that Coker is the next best thing since sliced bread...You laughing at Theo Johnson in reference to our guys too? LOL No one in their right mind thinks Nabers is anything but a stud (definitely top 10 if not 5 potential). You do realize that Thomas was in a new system with a furst-time coach last year (with a questionable QB to boot)? And yet still, it's possible that he eclipses even T-mac (not saying that he will). They didn't even mention Travis Hunter. In any event, we're not in the top half. Draft another legit receiver, and we will be. 
    • Absolutely, very fair assessment of the team. 
×
×
  • Create New...