Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nfl.com win projections based on schedule. Vegas odds lol


Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Honestly, AFC West isn't particularly great outside of KC. And Washington and NYG aren't very good either...

That being said, we will probably still lose most, if not all, of those games because we suck

It's possible you see a turnaround in SD. The Raiders have a ceiling with Minshew and I would honestly be shocked if the Broncos are anything but a disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

It's possible you see a turnaround in SD. The Raiders have a ceiling with Minshew and I would honestly be shocked if the Broncos are anything but a disaster.

It happens all the time. Last year we were winning the nfcs and look how that turned out. Things change quickly when the games start to matter. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, raleigh-panther said:

Make Playoffs: +800

Win Division: +1300

Win Conference: +12500

Win Super Bowl: +25000

I don't think anything shifted with the schedule release.
Mid April, Vegas was offering the same odds.

They're also doing +2000 for Canales to win Coach of the Year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I put 50 down on 20/1 odds to win the division on draftkings. I thought those odds were ridiculous considering how weak the division is. Falcons suck. Bucs and Saints have bad coaching and are mediocre. Multiple times there have been worst-to-first champions of the NFCS.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Not sure how or where, but I think we win at least 6.

I think that will largely depend on how good Canales will be at creating an offense. I have to remind myself he is the least experienced headcoach in the league. He has 1 year as an OC from which he may or may not have designed the entire offense. That's a big ask for someone so green and a team so messed up. In reality there's probably only 3 new starters on offense with a few rookies thrown in, who may or my not contribute right away. They only thing that will truly be different is the offensive playbook. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Torn achilles.  The reason he was out more than half of last season.
    • When the panthers are bad, we sell a shockingly low number of jerseys, and options become limited. In the good years, we had a lot of different options. I think T-Mac is going to have to play well on the field for his jersey to get produced in the FUSE template. 
    • it's not the only way to be a threat, it's certainly important for certain roles in an offense and for certain type players and offenses.  as is the ability to get open quickly and generate easy throws.   as far as Renfrow goes, I have consistently said he is sort of his own thing and not really in comp w/ others here.  It's a niche role/job.  Anyone talking about something else from him isn't me.  Just depends if we want to do what he does and if he can still do it.  as far as AT goes, yeah, he does lower our ceiling given the % of our offense that goes through him and his limitations at this stage in his career.    He should be a roleplayer, much like Renfrow should be if we want to insert what he does into the O....not an O being run through him.    Renfrow isn't going to lower the ceiling if used correctly.  Niche assignments to move chains.   It's like a short yardage RB that comes in to pick a random play.  Renfrow is best at that 3rd and 4 type scenario IMO. AT lowers the ceiling because we build the pass game off an old WR that shouldn't be the focal point of a pass attack.  Not to mention, Bryce Young is practically tailor made to get the ball in the hands of YAC players.   So you need those type on the field. 
×
×
  • Create New...