Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who needs a million dollars? Apparently, nobody


PanthersATL
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 6/11/2024 at 12:44 PM, jayboogieman said:

My mom has been on medicare for five years or so now. It gets worse over time and they pay less each year as they shift medicines from one tier to another. She has an inhaler and they started making her copay higher than what they paid last year. Thankfully, the local pharmacy she uses started giving her the generic version for less than her copay as the price for the name brand version went up.

Wasn't talking about Medicare exactly.  Medicare advantage is different.  The one my mom uses is thru blue cross and blue shield.  

Medicare Advantage (Part C) | Blue Cross Blue Shield (bcbs.com)

My mom has been using it for about six months now.  Before she was using a medigap program run by United Health Care and it paid almost everything, but was costing her 400 a month.  The Medicare advantage plan doesn't cost anything (the premiums are actually paid by Medicare).  Now she does have copayments, some of them for for medicine, but so far, they aren't bad.  Hers also covers dental, which medicare normally doesn't cover.  

I will state though that my Mom has Medicare part b (she pays for it, but gets reimbursed by the employer my stepdad retired from).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/16/2024 at 9:04 PM, Davidson Deac II said:

Wasn't talking about Medicare exactly.  Medicare advantage is different.  The one my mom uses is thru blue cross and blue shield.  

Medicare Advantage (Part C) | Blue Cross Blue Shield (bcbs.com)

My mom has been using it for about six months now.  Before she was using a medigap program run by United Health Care and it paid almost everything, but was costing her 400 a month.  The Medicare advantage plan doesn't cost anything (the premiums are actually paid by Medicare).  Now she does have copayments, some of them for for medicine, but so far, they aren't bad.  Hers also covers dental, which medicare normally doesn't cover.  

I will state though that my Mom has Medicare part b (she pays for it, but gets reimbursed by the employer my stepdad retired from).  

There is a reason that if you watch any television that there are so many medicare commercials with old folks tottering around confused.  It is a money making racket.  The medicare insurance companies will buy you $50 worth of aspirin or " healthy" foods" a month through special stipends ( while gasp you pay nothing extra other than your approximately $170 a month removed from your social security check ) , but when its time to get that new drug that could save your life or that surgery - good friggin luck. You need pre approval from the insurance company.  I know- I have seen it first hand.  Traditional medicare is at least up front that they will pay for just about everything except your 20% copay and it is good for any health care facility- no pre approval needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Paa Langfart said:

There is a reason that if you watch any television that there are so many medicare commercials with old folks tottering around confused.  It is a money making racket.  The medicare insurance companies will buy you $50 worth of aspirin or " healthy" foods" a month through special stipends ( while gasp you pay nothing extra other than your approximately $170 a month removed from your social security check ) , but when its time to get that new drug that could save your life or that surgery - good friggin luck. You need pre approval from the insurance company.  I know- I have seen it first hand.  Traditional medicare is at least up front that they will pay for just about everything except your 20% copay and it is good for any health care facility- no pre approval needed.

I strongly disagree and I have direct and recent experience with it.  I help my mom manage her finances, and the Medicare advantage plan has been a huge benefit and a great thing for her.  The $170 a month you are referring to (Medicare part b) was already being taken out of her account well before she switched to the Medicare advantage plan. It is something Medicare does for additional coverage of prescription medicine and other services.  

And no, Medicare wouldn't pay for everything, if you only have part a (when you don't have the $170 taken out of your social security).  The 20% copay you referred to is only if you have Medicare part b and have the additional money take out of your social security.  

In addition to the 50 a month, she gets 2000 a year in dental coverage which Medicare doesn't provide.  They also have other benefits, such as life alert (which would cost 40 a month if she had to pay for it herself).  Not saying it doesn't have drawbacks, but the advantages far outweigh the disadvantages.  

Edited by Davidson Deac II
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you don't have Medicare part b (the one that cost $170 per month, Medicare won't cover things like ambulance service, wheel chairs, some prescription medication, diabetes supplies, therapy and counseling etc.... One trip in an ambulance could cost as much as $1200

 

If you believe that Medicare and indeed all health and health insurance should be redesigned, I agree with you.  But as far as what is available right now, at this point in time, in my opinion, (based on working with my mom for 15 years now dealing with straight Medicare, Medicare part b, part d, and medicare advantage plans), Medicare advantage is far and away the easiest and cheapest to deal with.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

And no, Medicare wouldn't pay for everything, if you only have part a (when you don't have the $170 taken out of your social security). 

Far as I know you have no choice but to have the money removed from your ss check and is always a mystery to me why younger folks think medicare is  " free".  Not only do you or your employer pay in advance your whole working life, but you continue to pay monthly " premiums" until you die once you start to draw ss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

the advantages far outweigh the disadvantages.  

until you yourself actually come down with one of the disadvantages that they decide not to cover.  Like I said - they make it all seem great with little perks that basically cost them nothing because most people don't take advantage of them.  

 

 

A retirement specialist is warning seniors to prepare now as Medicare Advantage cuts are likely to come during the next year.

Bob Carlson, an attorney and accountant who runs Retirement Watch, a monthly newsletter and site on retirement planning, wrote in an article for Forbes that Medicare Advantage plans will be cut as the federal government looks to reduce its spending.

Carlson said Medicare Advantage plans tend to be popular because they generally have lower costs if you are healthy and can bundle supplementary insurance and drug coverage options.  They also tend to be more profitable with insurers.

Still, the federal government is looking to curb its costs by reducing Medicare Advantage options.

"Reduced payments to Medicare Advantage sponsors are likely to cause changes in the plans in 2025, such as higher premiums, copayments, and deductibles as well as reduced coverage," Carlson said.

"The areas of cuts will vary by insurance company and even down to the individual plans," Fong told Newsweek. "We are either expecting higher copays or lower extra benefits which include health foods grocery, dental, vision, hearing, transportation and any non-Medicare covered benefits."

Medicare Advantage Cuts Coming This Year, Retirement Specialist Warns (msn.com)

 

from the linked article -  They also tend to be more profitable with insurers.

hmmmm, I wonder how those good hearted insurance companies do it?

Edited by Paa Langfart
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/8/2024 at 1:34 PM, LinvilleGorge said:

Then again, if you get into a situation where you need assisted living you're going to chew through a million way faster than you'd think. As long as you can live on your own you can make money go a long way living modestly but assisted living is out-fuging-rageous.

I don't think most Americans know the comical price of assisted living care.  I mean, that million would be gone in 2 years.   And that's just the average.  Higher cost state or a nice facility?  It would be gone real quick. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, CRA said:

I don't think most Americans know the comical price of assisted living care.  I mean, that million would be gone in 2 years.   And that's just the average.  Higher cost state or a nice facility?  It would be gone real quick. 

I definitely didn't until my wife's grandmother had to go into assisted living. Unless you're legit RICH whatever money you have saved up is gonna be gone in the blink of an eye.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
On 6/19/2024 at 1:42 PM, CRA said:

I don't think most Americans know the comical price of assisted living care.  I mean, that million would be gone in 2 years.   And that's just the average.  Higher cost state or a nice facility?  It would be gone real quick. 

Its expensive, no doubt.  And a big concern.  But I think you are exaggerating a little.  My wife works at one of the high end retirement homes and the cost is about 8000 per month and is all inclusive (food, most medicine, in house medical care).  Of course, the cost may be higher in other areas. If you start out with a million when you move in, it would last about 10 years for one person, or 5 years for two.  A more average facility in the area we live is around 5 grand a month.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure it does and social media is likely a HUGE driver of it. Seems like social media is dominated by "fake it til you make it" types. Then you have shows on HGTV and the like where the husband is a dog catcher and the wife is a stay at home mom for their two kids and they're home shopping with a $1.2M budget. Um... WTF???

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Retirement fund managers really, really need you to keep $1 million in your retirement accounts to manage. And, well, so does the stock market. And some will tell you that, in turn, so does the economy.

Really, though, it's who you are, what you want and how much cushion you want in your old age. Our country has a very difficult time dealing with the needs of the aged and this whole argument about how much money is needed really misses the point of what is actually needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just chasing targets is a fools game. Chase averaged 85 yrds and .76 TDs per game his first year and 87.16 yrds, and .75 TD's per game his second year. Statistically the same. NOT an improvement. Puka saw no increase either. Yes, Waddle's went down because he had to share targets with another receiver - just like TMac will have to share targets with Coker next year so you have actually just made my point concerning Coker. Olave saw an increase in targets but Carr replaced Dalton and even with the increase in targets, his production was pretty flat (83 extra yards and 1 more TD for the entire year). And Wilson's number did increase but the Jets replaced the other two receivers and their contribution was significantly down from Davis's and Moore's. Again, nothing in those numbers should lead anyone to believe there will be a big leap for Tmac next year.       
    • See my previous post. You're also leaving out that T-Mac was likely hitting a rookie wall, like 95% of rookies do late in their first season, combined with the added attention on him by defenses, which in turn would be why Bryce looked Coker's way down the stretch.  With Coker playing like that to start next year, defenses will have to pay attention to it, which will then also make things easier for T-Mac. All of which is also ignoring that T-Mac will just be a better player next year than he was this year, assuming he works on his game this offseason, which we all know he will be.  If a player who was already your clear cut #1 comes back even better his next season, you're going to make sure you're throwing it his way more often, no matter who else you have. Again, Coker's added targets won't be at the expense of T-Mac's, they will BOTH be taking targets from the rest of the team.  Not to mention, we should be passing it more next year to begin with, seeing as we'll have both of them hopefully ready to go full speed Week 1, which again, will help both their target totals increase. Coker looks like a really good player, but even the most optimistic person can't say he looks like he has #1 potential, he has very solid to maybe even high end #2 potential.  You're not taking targets away from the reigning OROY who looks like a true Top 15 WR already to get your #2 targets, you increase both of them by taking from the others.
    • Need to crush the hawks tonight. A lose would really damage momentum 
×
×
  • Create New...