Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

To those with kids - SUV or Minivan

hepcat

By hepcat,
in Huddle Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
Posted

Been an SUV person my whole driving life. But with kiddos I'm pretty close to getting a minivan for the sliding doors and extra space/comfort. The features you get with the minivans are way higher than the SUVs for similar prices from what I can see. I've test driven the Honda Odyssey, Toyota Sienna, Chrysler Pacifica, Honda Pilot, and Toyota Highlander. I read that the Kia Carnival is supposed to be nice but I #1 can't bring myself to consider a Kia and I think they're butt ugly. 

If you ended up with a specific SUV or minivan, why and what do you like about it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Honestly, go with a minivan. The "SUVs" you're looking at are just minivans without the convenience of the sliding door. They just took a minivan and put standard doors on it to label it and SUV. A Honda Pilot is literally just a minivan with four swinging doors.

Yea we kinda relinquished to being minivan people for the next 5-7 years or so until kids are old enough not to need carseats and boosters anymore. Sliding doors are awesome, so much easier to stick a kid in. I liked the Odyssey a lot. The Sienna is just a stupid price at this point too, although it's a nice minivan as well.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
  • Author
Posted
15 minutes ago, CRA said:

I'm anti SUV with small children (specifically if you need a 3rd row) unless you get a ride that has captain seats in the 2nd row.  Otherwise, the 3rd row is an utter nightmare. 

3rd row in the minivan is a breeze! Minivans are sweet from everything I've seen in my test drive, they just lack the cool factor of an SUV. The low clearance is an issue every once in awhile too but not enough to make me not want to buy one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
Just now, hepcat said:

3rd row in the minivan is a breeze! Minivans are sweet from everything I've seen in my test drive, they just lack the cool factor of an SUV. The low clearance is an issue every once in awhile too but not enough to make me not want to buy one. 

I don't know anyone that went mini van and regretted it with small children.  But there does seem to be some mental hurdle for some folks to going to the van life. 

and it's hard to find captain seat 2nd row SUVs.   And those are the only bearable ones IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, CRA said:

I don't know anyone that went mini van and regretted it with small children.  But there does seem to be some mental hurdle for some folks to going to the van life. 

and it's hard to find captain seat 2nd row SUVs.   And those are the only bearable ones IMO. 

The Highlander we drove had captains chairs. But the odyssey is sweet because it has a removable middle piece of the second row and you can make them captains chairs or have a bench. And the chairs slide. It is a nice feature 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PootieNunu Grand Master

PootieNunu

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, CRA said:

I'm anti SUV with small children (specifically if you need a 3rd row) unless you get a ride that has captain seats in the 2nd row.  Otherwise, the 3rd row is an utter nightmare. 

Everyone loves climbing over the 2nd row to sit in the 3rd row dont they? Genius design. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
toldozer Grand Master

toldozer

Posted
Posted
On 7/2/2024 at 12:16 PM, hepcat said:

Been an SUV person my whole driving life. But with kiddos I'm pretty close to getting a minivan for the sliding doors and extra space/comfort. The features you get with the minivans are way higher than the SUVs for similar prices from what I can see. I've test driven the Honda Odyssey, Toyota Sienna, Chrysler Pacifica, Honda Pilot, and Toyota Highlander. I read that the Kia Carnival is supposed to be nice but I #1 can't bring myself to consider a Kia and I think they're butt ugly. 

If you ended up with a specific SUV or minivan, why and what do you like about it?

My wife actuality actually wants the carnival specifically bc of the looks.  I really just want to hold on to our  2.7% cars that are almost paid off.  Putting my daughter into my compact suv nearly breaks my back but our traverse isn't too bad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted

I'd never heard of the Kia Carnival before but it's kind of an interesting concept and one that I'm surprised took so long to come around. Basically disguise a minivan as an SUV but actually retain the functional benefits of a minivan. That makes a helluva lot more sense than the "crossover SUV" platform which basically disguised a minivan as an SUV while sacrificing the actual functional benefits of both platforms. I've honestly always thought that the crossover SUV was the worst vehicle concept of all time in terms of actual functionality but they became wildly popular because people liked the way they looked and they were considerably cheaper than an actual truck based platform SUV. A+ for the marketing team. They sold a ton of those poo sandwiches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'd never heard of the Kia Carnival before but it's kind of an interesting concept and one that I'm surprised took so long to come around. Basically disguise a minivan as an SUV but actually retain the functional benefits of a minivan. That makes a helluva lot more sense than the "crossover SUV" platform which basically disguised a minivan as an SUV while sacrificing the actual functional benefits of both platforms. I've honestly always thought that the crossover SUV was the worst vehicle concept of all time in terms of actual functionality but they became wildly popular because people liked the way they looked and they were considerably cheaper than an actual truck based platform SUV. A+ for the marketing team. They sold a ton of those poo sandwiches.

 

5 hours ago, toldozer said:

My wife actuality actually wants the carnival specifically bc of the looks.  I really just want to hold on to our  2.7% cars that are almost paid off.  Putting my daughter into my compact suv nearly breaks my back but our traverse isn't too bad. 

Went to a Kia dealer this afternoon with the intention of test driving a used 2020 Sienna they supposedly had, but it was already sold. So we peeked at the Carnivals while we were there, but I thought they were even uglier in person. I don't see the SUV in disguise, I saw an uglier bulkier looking minivan. Interiors are nice though, it felt more like the Odyssey interior.

The minivan stock is really low right now, not trying to buy new but we might have to just to have some options. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
toldozer Grand Master

toldozer

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, hepcat said:

 

Went to a Kia dealer this afternoon with the intention of test driving a used 2020 Sienna they supposedly had, but it was already sold. So we peeked at the Carnivals while we were there, but I thought they were even uglier in person. I don't see the SUV in disguise, I saw an uglier bulkier looking minivan. Interiors are nice though, it felt more like the Odyssey interior.

The minivan stock is really low right now, not trying to buy new but we might have to just to have some options. 

 

I haven't looked at them in person or even too much online. My wife swears they look like an SUV and much better then other minivans. Again I have no interest in an almost 40k purchase at 7% or whatever it is right now

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
On 7/4/2024 at 4:25 PM, toldozer said:

I haven't looked at them in person or even too much online. My wife swears they look like an SUV and much better then other minivans. Again I have no interest in an almost 40k purchase at 7% or whatever it is right now

Yea the prices and interest rates on vehicles right now are pretty crazy although the prices have gone down a little. 

We ended up buying a 2021 Odyssey EX-L with 44k miles over the weekend. 36k OTD. They put new tires on the van and it was fully inspected and serviced. It is a certified used Honda with 1 year remaining bumper to bumper warranty and 4 years powertrain warranty. I ended up buying a 4 yr dealer extended bumper to bumper warranty for an extra $2,400 which included 8 oil changes and tire rotations with no time cap. I'm not one to usually buy extended warranties but with the oil changes and tire rotations included I thought it was a pretty good deal, if literally anything breaks we're fully covered until 2029. 

Edited by hepcat
Link to comment
Share on other sites
KSpan Grand Master

KSpan

Posted
Posted (edited)

Our 3 boys are older now but there's only a 3.5 years spread total between them... there is no SUV in existence that can match convenience and ease that a van provides when it comes to small children. You made the right call. 

Edited by KSpan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • csx
      How long do you feel it takes for a head coach to turn a team around?

      By csx · Posted

      Canales has his msjor issue not doing the obvious regarding running Dowdle but with an average QB we would be in the playoffs with an average QB. 
    • kungfoodude
      How long do you feel it takes for a head coach to turn a team around?

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      1. fug TikTak, I ain't clicking that stupid poo. 2. This is really very situationally dependent. Coaching is a huge part but sometimes you step into a scenario where a lot of building needs to happen that is largely out of your control  Recent examples(Last season's hiring cycle): 1. Ben Johnson Johnson chose the OVERWHELMINGLY best open coaching job due to a combination of solid ownership, a solid front office and the most talented roster of the open jobs from that cycle. Negatives were, insanely stacked division. Results have so far indicated that this coaching change has been a massive boost. 2. Mike Vrabel Vrabel went a different direction. He went to a franchise that has solid ownership, a mediocre front office and one of the worst roster in the NFL. However, he has a track record of NFL head coaching success AND lucked into one of the easiest schedules in NFL history(I believe 3rd easiest). Even with that caveat, a clear indicator that coaching has been a huge boost. 3. Pete Carroll Carroll chose one of the NFL's most voliate franchises. Notoriously bad ownership, very bad front office and a terrible roster. But, Carroll is a HOF caliber NFL HC with success at every stop. At the moment, coaching has not been able to overcome the apparent obstacles. In fact, it's been a complete diaster to the extent that Carroll has already fired multiple coaches. One could certainly argue that pethaps Pete has lost his touch but regardless, this coaching change didn't result in a turnaround and Carroll's future there seems in doubt. 4. Aaron Glenn Glenn's first HC opportunity was a doozy. Near worst ownership, a mediocre front office(at best) and a talented core group of players on an underwhelming roster. This experiment has been quite the ride to date. Glenn's personnel decisions have seemingly led to multiple close game losses(2-5 in games decided by one score or less) and the FO decided to have a roster firesale prior to the trade deadline for a wealth of draft capital. The question will be if Glenn will be given the time to actually see this future draft capital realized, now that a significant chunk of the talented core is not longer there. Coaching has not made a difference but is the franchise now setting him up to fail further? 5. Liam Coen Coen picked a mixed bag. Terrible ownership, a remade front office he essentially had a hand in selecting(or at the miminum influenced) and a middling roster. The early results show promise even if the roster shows significant flaws(and Coen shows visible frustration with his "franchise" QB every Sunday). Could be close to turning a 4 win team into a playoff berth. Coaching has mattered. 6. Brian Schottenheimer This was resoundingly viewed as a bad hire but it's also under challenging circumstances. Bad ownership in the sense that the ownership is also the front office, a future Tepper dream I assume. Very talented but very flawed roster. The initial results have been...interesting. A Cowboys team that was a bad 7-10 after a previous streak of three 12 win seasons is now....mediocre? Couple that with wild roster changes prior to the start of the season and up to the trade deadline and it makes for an incomplete picture. It's not much progress but it doesn’t appear to be regressing either. TBD. 6. Kellen Moore Moore chose the most challenging of all openings. The Saints are in the midst of a simulateous roster teardown and attempted rebuild. Decent ownership, a mixed bag in the front office(great at evaluating draft talent, less so in free agency and in salary cap management). The Saints have been awful but, they were expected to be awful. To that note, they were net sellers before the trade deadline. It was reported that Moore secured an agreement that this is long term building effort prior to taking the position so his status seems safe even while the team flounders week to week. Difficult to grade this now as the entire scenario seems to be a long term strategy. TBD.
    • Tr3ach
      How long do you feel it takes for a head coach to turn a team around?

      By Tr3ach · Posted

      I think he has started to build a culture here.  I think if we had a qb with no limitations we would be seeing a lot more with the offense.  I think most of the coaches that come in and instantly win went to teams that were underachieving previously based on roster talent level.  Based on our roster talent,  we werent underachieving,  we were just bad.
×
×
  • Create New...