Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB School, A Reminder of our 2023 Offense


SetfreexX
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, hepcat said:

It's a chicken and egg thing. Is the offense bad because of the scheme/coaching or because of the players? When the offense was as bad as the 2023 Panthers, the answer was likely both. Good players can occasionally overcome bad coaching/scheme and vice versa good coaching/scheme can overcome bad players. 

The truth is, Frank Reich's offense was total garbage AND the offense was devoid of talent. 

No need to go backwards, 2024 is going to be bad too!

I think 2024 is going to look a lot more like 2021/2022 than 2023, at least from a statistical standpoint. It will be an improvement, but still mediocre. I'm just hoping that better o-line play translates into results for Bryce. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, SetfreexX said:

Bryce has a lot he needed ro work on (my guy was AR15).

However, we have Bryce and I can admit he flashed plenty, and in some cases overcame the deficiencies and got in position to win games.

No QB was surviving what we put out there last year...saying he sucked with all the negatives around him goes a bit far.

 

I will say as bad as Bryce looked, AR15 looks like he has about 3-4 more years in the NFL.

The gulf between Stroud and everyone else appears massive. In a re-draft Bryce and Richardson probably slide to day 3.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not in same league. Caldwell just hit a 10.00 on the RAS. 2nd out of 3830 from 1987 onward.  https://x.com/MathBomb/status/2027885023387349047 Yeah I mean Louis had a sub 9.00 RAS. Still very very good, no doubt. Louis is small, no 2 ways about it. He is likely a sub package lb in nickel packages or specialized WLB. Be fine ST gunner to start for sure. 6 foot flat and 220lb is pushing it for a starting LB. At 10 to 20lbs less than the other LBs he'd better be closer to the top in most timed drills. He's gonna be challenged when some of the wrs in the class can matchup bigger stronger faster, much less TE in the run game.  Yeah instinct matter and he has them, but that size is a massive red flag compared to many of the other LBS in this class.    Rodriguez is the LB that really climbed this week from a pure grit guy to great flash with athleticism people wrote off cause he was a QB at first at UVA. 18.4mph in the backpedal. Production the last 2 years were great. I'd be thrilled with him as the future mike.   Hill likely moved out of 51 and into the top 45 picks ( Ravens at 45 I can't imagine don't bite if he makes it there). Honestly Hill imo is a 1st rounder and I'd be ok with him as he fits the MLB we have missed the last few years. People would crow it's a reach but he's top 30 all-time I'm RAS for a LB at 9.9+ . Plus he was big time in big games when he was healthy. And that br a big check: meds. 
    • Miller, Melo, Coby, Moose, and Bridges all on the floor at the same time must be a nightmare for defenses lol. Switch one out for Kon and still a nightmare. Coby really does bring a true 6th man value and looks like he could start if Melo was out after only a few games of getting his feet wet. 
×
×
  • Create New...