Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

LMAO I'm done.

 

Speaking of Tmac he's about to play. Guess I'm gonna watch him now. If you have been following me lately you would know that I have been saying we need to draft either Hunter or Tmac. Unlike you I can admit both players are great and I don't have to tear down Tmac to prove my point.

So me saying Hunter is a 1st round talent on either side of the ball, but he's a better CB prospect than WR, and if he did go in as a WR he's still the #2 or #3 WR in the draft, while also saying he's a legit generational college talent.........

Is me not admitting he's a great player and is me tearing him down?

What fuging planet are you living on?!?!?!?!?!

This is such a baffling post, I've done nothing but give Hunter respect in all of my posts about him and have just said he's not going to be a 2 way player at the next level and he's not as good of a WR prospect as T-Mac is.

But sure, I guess that's the same thing as me not admitting he's a great player and tearing him down, that makes total sense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

If Hunter enters the draft as a WR, then 100% yes, and a very solid chance Burden goes before him as well.

If he enters as a CB, there's just no way to predict it as it comes down to team needs of course.

I just checked the stats and Hunter has more receptions, more yards, and more receiving TDs than Tmac.

 

Tmac has yet to play so this could change after his game tonight.

 

Just saying bro you calling people dumb yet my guy is literally has better WR stats and this is with him playing defense.

 

Something not adding up. Maybe you need to look in the mirror and question yourself...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I just checked the stats and Hunter has more receptions, more yards, and more receiving TDs than Tmac.

 

Tmac has yet to play so this could change after his game tonight.

 

Just saying bro you calling people dumb yet my guy is literally has better WR stats and this is with him playing defense.

 

Something not adding up. Maybe you need to look in the mirror and question yourself...

Why are stats your end all be all in the discussion between two players?

Since when do raw stats have anything to do with NFL potential, do you not realize how different the college game is and how the stats aren't everything?

Malik Washington

Oh, who's that you probably ask?

He was a 6th round draft pick by the Dolphins this past year.

Why do I bring him up you ask?

Because he lead the nation last year with 110 catches, was 4th in yards, and a pathetic 26th in TD's

BUT STATS!!!!!!!!!!  OH MY GOD!!!! HOW CAN WE EVER JUDGE TWO PLAYERS DRAFT PROSPECTS AGAINST EACH OTHER ON ANYTHING OTHER THAN STATS?!?!?!?!?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I just checked the stats and Hunter has more receptions, more yards, and more receiving TDs than Tmac.

 

Tmac has yet to play so this could change after his game tonight.

 

Just saying bro you calling people dumb yet my guy is literally has better WR stats and this is with him playing defense.

 

Something not adding up. Maybe you need to look in the mirror and question yourself...

Oh, and side note, if you're going to tout stats as the trump card in a discussion, maybe you should learn how to look at them better.

Because yes, as of this moment, Hunter has 46 catches, 561 yards, and 6 TDs compared to T-Mac's 23, 453, and 4 TDs

So yea, Hunter has 23 catches, 108 yards, and 2 TDs more than T-Mac, and like you said, T-Mac hasn't played yet today.  But what you didn't look at is that Colorado already had played one more game than Arizona this season before this week as we were on bye last week, so those numbers are now having played 2 more games than T-Mac.

Sure, the 23 more catches is impressive, but 108 more yards in 2 more games, not so much.  That also points out my comparison between the two, Hunter isn't the downfield threat that T-Mac is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Why are stats your end all be all in the discussion between two players?

Since when do raw stats have anything to do with NFL potential, do you not realize how different the college game is and how the stats aren't everything?

Malik Washington

Oh, who's that you probably ask?

He was a 6th round draft pick by the Dolphins this past year.

Why do I bring him up you ask?

Because he lead the nation last year with 110 catches, was 4th in yards, and a pathetic 26th in TD's

BUT STATS!!!!!!!!!!  OH MY GOD!!!! HOW CAN WE EVER JUDGE TWO PLAYERS DRAFT PROSPECTS AGAINST EACH OTHER ON ANYTHING OTHER THAN STATS?!?!?!?!?!

Because you keep complaining about how he is not a better WR.

If Tmac didn't have that 300 yard game he would be getting blown out. Stats play a factor.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I just checked the stats and Hunter has more receptions, more yards, and more receiving TDs than Tmac.

 

Tmac has yet to play so this could change after his game tonight.

 

Just saying bro you calling people dumb yet my guy is literally has better WR stats and this is with him playing defense.

 

Something not adding up. Maybe you need to look in the mirror and question yourself...

You are comparing 5 games vs 3 games worth of stats.   

per game, it’s Tmac

Hunter is the best football player in college football.  He doesn’t project as the best WR in the draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CamWhoaaCam said:

Because you keep complaining about how he is not a better WR.

If Tmac didn't have that 300 yard game he would be getting blown out. Stats play a factor.

 

 

And per my latest post, that Hunter only has 108 more yards despite playing 2 more games so far?

You want to discount a 300 yard game but ignore that?

Okay, makes sense to me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tukafan21 said:

Oh, and side note, if you're going to tout stats as the trump card in a discussion, maybe you should learn how to look at them better.

Because yes, as of this moment, Hunter has 46 catches, 561 yards, and 6 TDs compared to T-Mac's 23, 453, and 4 TDs

So yea, Hunter has 23 catches, 108 yards, and 2 TDs more than T-Mac, and like you said, T-Mac hasn't played yet today.  But what you didn't look at is that Colorado already had played one more game than Arizona this season before this week as we were on bye last week, so those numbers are now having played 2 more games than T-Mac.

Sure, the 23 more catches is impressive, but 108 more yards in 2 more games, not so much.  That also points out my comparison between the two, Hunter isn't the downfield threat that T-Mac is.

I'm watching Tmac right now. I hope he balls out tonight.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CamWhoaaCam said:

Yet you told me stats don't matter LMAO

 

Make up your mind. Stats are only convenient when you want them to be.

First of all, THAT post wasn't me

Second of all, I've said that traits and how they project to the NFL game matter more than stats, but if you're going to look at stats, you have to look at them correctly anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Yet you told me stats don't matter LMAO

 

Make up your mind. Stats are only convenient when you want them to be.

When did I say stats don’t matter.  But if you are asking, they aren’t the final say of a discussion.     
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Also hit the over.  Banking on Man City running up the score and Leeds getting a lucky strike.   
    • Tailed you.  Also Free Play, which is why the risk shows $0.00. Let me look at hoops and get back to you.  Always fade Hubert, haha. 
    • Hard to say right now, but good thinking.  I look at this as the info we need for free agency.  Looks like we are going to free up about $10m so far; watch to see if any contracts (Moehrig, Horn, Brown, etc) are reworked the first week of March.  Then after free agency, we will have a pretty good idea. Right now, to be fair to your question because I am sure you are aware of its timing: In free agency, I see us adding an OT of some sort and drafting one at some point.  It all depends on how they view Ickey, Nijman, and maybe BC.  That OT could be Nijman.  I do not see the future OT--just a stop gap. I see the Panthers signing a free-agent center.  I think the market is strong.  I see Fortner from the Saints as a prime candidate and his salary is estimated at $6m by Spotrac.  the Saints are $42m over the cap, so I doubt they are able to re-sign many of their own.  He will be 28.  I also expect them to re-sign Corbett (depth) at a vet min ($1.5m) deal. I also see free agency as a strong area to get a free safety who can play and is under age 30.  Hawkins, Cook, and Bryant are all around age 27-28, play at a high level, and should be had for about $15m per. EDGE: Arnold Ebiketie is a good value because he gets pressure at a high percentage.  He had 2 sacks and Atlanta just drafted 2 pass rushers last year.   He has a 70+ PFF rating and will (Spotrac) demand about $9m.  While he is not the answer, he is a great third down option with Princely and he would allow for Jones, Scourton, and Princely to develop.
×
×
  • Create New...