Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

People are gonna be screaming ref protection but that's an incomplete pass.

maybe.  But given they called it a fumble….I think the refs disregarded the rule and evidence required to change a call.   

Which is basically the VT scenario.  I probably would have liked both those calls to be different on the field.  But they weren’t.  So I do think Miami gets saved by the refs ignoring the actual criteria required to change a play just using replay to remake the call (probably correctly). 

Refs ain’t doing that for most teams.  So I think it fair to say the refs bail them out where most teams get screwed by the rules 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jayboogieman said:

I had thought they would have blown the whistle instead of letting Louisville pickup the ball and return it.

I like them letting it play out. When in doubt go with the call on the field that can get fixed by replay. Blow it dead and you can't fix it. You can give the, the ball but you can't give them the points.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

maybe.  But given they called it a TD….I think the refs disregarded the rule and evidence required to change a call.   

Which is basically the VT scenario.  I probably would have liked both those calls to be different on the field.  But they weren’t.  So I do think Miami gets saved by the refs ignoring the actual criteria required to change a play just using reply to remake the call (probably correctly). 

Refs ain’t doing that for most teams 

 

He had clear control of the ball with the hand moving forward. By the letter of the rule it was very clear cut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...